Literature DB >> 8580753

Adrenal nonhyperfunctioning adenoma and nonadenoma: CT attenuation value as discriminative index.

H Miyake1, H Takaki, S Matsumoto, S Yoshida, T Maeda, H Mori.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When an asymptomatic adrenal mass is incidentally discovered on abdominal CT scans, the distinction between a nonhyperfunctioning adenoma and a nonadenoma would be important.
METHODS: We evaluated the CT findings of 36 adrenal masses (14 nonhyperfunctioning adenomas, 22 nonadenomas) in 34 patients with no evidence of hormonal hypersecretion. CT attenuation values of adrenal masses on CT scans were calculated by setting a circular region of interest as large as possible in the center of each adrenal mass.
RESULTS: Below 20 HU in CT attenuation values, all adrenal masses, except one case of ganglioneuroma with myxomatous change, were nonhyperfunctioning adenomas. With an arbitrary threshold of 20 HU, the sensitivity of CT attenuation values in distinguishing nonhyperfunctioning adenomas from nonadenomas was 64%, the specificity was 95%, and the accuracy was 83%. When decreasing the threshold to 15 HU, the sensitivity was 64%, the specificity was 100%, and the accuracy was 86%. The CT attenuation value on noncontrast CT was more useful for making this distinction than the size and interior homogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that an asymptomatic adrenal mass with homogeneous low attenuation (< or = 15 HU) and less than or equal to 4 cm indicates a nonhyperfunctioning adenoma, and no further examinations are necessary. CT attenuation value on non-contrast CT is the most important discriminatory factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8580753     DOI: 10.1007/bf01256711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  9 in total

1.  Benign and malignant adrenal masses: CT distinction with attenuation coefficients, size, and observer analysis.

Authors:  M J Lee; P F Hahn; N Papanicolaou; T K Egglin; S Saini; P R Mueller; J F Simeone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Evaluation of adrenal masses in oncologic patients: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR vs CT.

Authors:  G P Krestin; G Freidmann; R Fishbach; K F Neufang; B Allolio
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Adrenal masses in oncologic patients: functional and morphologic evaluation.

Authors:  I R Francis; A Smid; M D Gross; B Shapiro; B Naylor; G M Glazer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Differentiation between small benign and malignant adrenal masses with dynamic incremented CT.

Authors:  L L Berland; D B Koslin; P J Kenney; R J Stanley; J Y Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  CT and MR distinction of adenomas and nonadenomas of the adrenal gland.

Authors:  A R van Erkel; A P van Gils; M Lequin; C Kruitwagen; J L Bloem; T H Falke
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Isolated adrenal masses in nonsmall-cell bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  T W Oliver; M E Bernardino; J I Miller; K Mansour; D Greene; W A Davis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Adrenal masses: differentiation with chemical shift, fast low-angle shot MR imaging.

Authors:  Y Tsushima; H Ishizaka; M Matsumoto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computed tomography in primary and secondary adrenal tumours.

Authors:  M Päivänsalo; S Lähde; J Merikanto; M Kallionen
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Differentiation of malignant from benign adrenal masses: predictive indices on computed tomography.

Authors:  S Hussain; A Belldegrun; S E Seltzer; J P Richie; R F Gittes; H L Abrams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.959

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Precision of the measurement of CT numbers: comparison of dual-energy CT spectral imaging with fast kVp switching and conventional CT with phantoms.

Authors:  Izuru Matsuda; Masaaki Akahane; Jiro Sato; Masaki Katsura; Shigeru Kiryu; Naoki Yoshioka; Akira Kunimatsu; Kenji Ino; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Differentiation of adrenal adenoma and nonadenoma in unenhanced CT: new optimal threshold value and the usefulness of size criteria for differentiation.

Authors:  Sung Hee Park; Myeong-Jin Kim; Joo Hee Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) findings in adrenal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Susumu Hijioka; Akira Sawaki; Nobumasa Mizuno; Kazuo Hara; Mohamed A Mekky; Hussein El-Amin; Zain El-Abdeen Ahmed Sayed; Mssahiro Tajika; Yasumasa Niwa; Kenji Yamao
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 4.  Adrenal incidentaloma: A puzzle for clinician.

Authors:  Sunil M Jain
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-10

Review 5.  Likelihood ratio of computed tomography characteristics for diagnosis of malignancy in adrenal incidentaloma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fatemeh Alsadat Sabet; Reza Majdzadeh; Babak Mostafazadeh Davani; Kazem Heidari; Akbar Soltani
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2016-04-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.