Literature DB >> 8579528

Convective mass transfer in hemodialysis.

M Y Jaffrin1.   

Abstract

Convective mass transfer in hemodialysis is associated with ultrafiltration (UF). In the absence of diffusion as in hemofiltration, the convective clearance is equal to S.QF where S is the apparent solute sieving coefficient and QF the UF flow rate, but the convective contribution significantly decreases when diffusion is present. A rigorous calculation of the combined diffusion-convection mass transfer for partially rejected solutes is very complex. In this paper we review various models of mass fluxes found in the literature. Since all these models express the mass flux through the membrane as a linear function of blood and dialysate concentrations with different coefficients, we present a general expression for the hemodiafiltration clearance combining diffusion and convection which can be adapted to each model of mass flux. A surprising result is that the convective contribution to the clearance is, in the limit of dominant ultrafiltration, independent of the solute sieving coefficient, in contrast to the model of Villaroel et al. This is due to the effect of increased solute concentration at the membrane which compensates exactly for the effect of the sieving coefficient. This effect is overlooked in the Villaroel et al. model which assumes well mixed blood and dialysate compartments. Comparison with in vitro clearance measurements for urea, creatinin, vitamin B12, and myoglobin (16,000 daltons) supports this observation even when diffusion dominates as in the case of clinical conditions for hemodiafiltration. An empirical correlation for the overall clearance valid for all solutes and blood flows between 200 and 500 ml/min is found to be K = KD + 0.43 QF + 8.3 x 10(-3) Q2F when clearances and QF are in ml/min.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8579528     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1995.tb02277.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  6 in total

Review 1.  Choices in hemodialysis therapies: variants, personalized therapy and application of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Bernard Canaud; Stefano Stuard; Frank Laukhuf; Grace Yan; Maria Ines Gomez Canabal; Paik Seong Lim; Michael A Kraus
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 2.  Clinical relevance of abstruse transport phenomena in haemodialysis.

Authors:  Sudhir K Bowry; Fatih Kircelli; Mooppil Nandakumar; Tushar J Vachharajani
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-27

3.  Performance Comparison of Alternative Hollow-Fiber Modules for Hemodialysis by Means of a CFD-Based Model.

Authors:  Nunzio Cancilla; Luigi Gurreri; Gaspare Marotta; Michele Ciofalo; Andrea Cipollina; Alessandro Tamburini; Giorgio Micale
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20

4.  Haemodiafiltration-optimal efficiency and safety.

Authors:  Ingrid Ledebo; Peter J Blankestijn
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2009-11-05

5.  Finite volume scheme for double convection-diffusion exchange of solutes in bicarbonate high-flux hollow-fiber dialyzer therapy.

Authors:  Kodwo Annan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Model of fluid and solute shifts during hemodialysis with active transport of sodium and potassium.

Authors:  Mauro Pietribiasi; Jacek Waniewski; Alicja Wójcik-Załuska; Wojciech Załuska; Bengt Lindholm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.