Literature DB >> 8579179

Utility of auditory brainstem response audiometry in diagnosis of acoustic neuromas.

S S Chandrasekhar1, D E Brackmann, K K Devgan.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) audiometry is said to be 90% sensitive in the diagnosis of acoustic neuromas. Since gadolinium-DTPA was introduced, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is capable of detecting acoustic neuromas as small as 3 mm. Early diagnosis is important, because hearing can frequently be preserved with resection of tumors smaller than 2 cm. At the same time, cost-containment has become a pressing issue in medicine. Auditory brainstem response, although considerably less expensive than MRI, may not be as sensitive as previously thought, particularly for small tumors. Of 753 acoustic neuromas treated at the House Ear Clinic from January 1988 through March 1993, 197 had ABR data available. The 98 males and 99 females ranged in age from 13 to 78 years with a mean of 48 years. The overall sensitivity of ABR was 92.3% using an interaural latency difference for wave V of more than 0.2 ms, and was 81.6% using waveform morphology. There was a statistically significant difference in sensitivity with respect to tumor size. Auditory brainstem response interaural latency difference sensitivity ranged from 100% in tumors larger than 3.0 cm to 83.1% in tumors 1.0 cm or smaller. Waveform morphology was abnormal in 100% of tumors larger than 2.0 cm but in only 76.5% of tumors 1.0 cm or smaller.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8579179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  6 in total

1.  [Early acoustic evoked potentials in patients with "small" vestibular schwannomas].

Authors:  I Baljić; E Börner-Lünser; D Eßer; O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 3.  Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A Comparison of Commercially Available Auditory Brainstem Response Stimuli at a Neurodiagnostic Intensity Level.

Authors:  Devan A Keesling; Jordan Paige Parker; Jason Tait Sanchez
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2017-02-01

5.  Diagnostic Validity of Auditory Brainstem Response for the Initial Screening of Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  Marn Joon Park; Joong Ho Ahn; Hong Ju Park; Jong Woo Chung; Woo Seok Kang
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2021-10-29

6.  Comparison of 3 ABR Methods for Diagnosis of Retrocochlear Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Krzysztof M Kochanek; Lech Śliwa; Marek Gołębiowski; Adam Piłka; Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-12-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.