Literature DB >> 8578376

Health outcome assessment before and after adult deformity surgery. A prospective study.

T J Albert1, J Purtill, J Mesa, T McIntosh, R A Balderston.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Fifty-five patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity assessed their health status using a generic health outcome instrument before surgery and at an average of 2 years after surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether adult spinal deformity surgery is a useful intervention when patients evaluate their own perception of health. The Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36, a validated generic health outcome assessment form, was used to measure patient's health status. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgery for adult scoliosis is technically demanding. No study that we are aware of uses a generic health outcome instrument in a prospective manner to compare patients' perception of their health after adult scoliosis surgery. The Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 has been validated in multiple studies assessing other medical conditions and was found to be reliable, comprehensive, brief, and generic.
METHODS: Sixty-eight adult patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity were prospectively enrolled. Fifty-five patients were available to complete the Medical Outcomes Surgery Short Form-36 after surgery. The scores of the health profile were compared before and after surgery. The results of patients younger than 40 years were compared with those of patients older than 40 years. The results of patients younger than 40 years were compared with those of patients older than 40 years. The results of patients fused to more caudal end vertebral levels ((L4, L5)5) were compared with those who were fused to more cranial end vertebral levels. The results of patients without complications after surgery were compared with those of patients with complications after surgery.
RESULTS: Average follow-up period was 22.5 months (minimum 12 months) in 82% of 68 patients. Statistically significant improvements were seen in postoperative scores for physical function, social function, bodily pain, and perceived health change. We found no significant differences in self-reported health function parameters related to age ( > 40 vs. < 40), end vertebral level of fusion, or presence of complications after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying a generic health outcome instrument to adult spinal deformity surgery shows that adult scoliosis surgery significantly improves patient self-reported health assessment and function. Beneficial results do not appear to deteriorate with age or more caudal end vertebral levels of fusion. Future studies combining disease-specific outcomes analysis and generic health surveys to assess end results of adult spinal deformity surgery will be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8578376     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199509150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Stress fracture of the hip and pubic rami after fusion to the sacrum in an adult with scoliosis: a case report.

Authors:  J A Morcuende; S Arauz; S L Weinstein
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2000

Review 2.  The adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adult lumbar scoliosis: underreported on lumbar MR scans.

Authors:  Z Anwar; E Zan; S K Gujar; D M Sciubba; L H Riley; Z L Gokaslan; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Complications in TLIF spondylodesis-do they influence the outcome for patients? A prospective two-center study.

Authors:  Philipp Poppenborg; Ulf Liljenqvist; Georg Gosheger; Albert Schulze Boevingloh; Lukas Lampe; Sebastian Schmeil; Tobias L Schulte; Tobias Lange
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Recovery following adult spinal deformity surgery: the effect of complications and reoperation in 149 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Justin K Scheer; Gregory M Mundis; Eric Klineberg; Robert A Hart; Vedat Deviren; Douglas C Burton; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Munish Gupta; John D Rolston; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The impact of osteoporosis on adult deformity surgery outcomes in Medicare patients.

Authors:  Kunal Varshneya; Anika Bhattacharjya; Rayyan T Jokhai; Parastou Fatemi; Zachary A Medress; Martin N Stienen; Allen L Ho; John K Ratliff; Anand Veeravagu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The impact of deep surgical site infection on surgical outcomes after posterior adult spinal deformity surgery: a matched control study.

Authors:  Sleiman Haddad; Susana Núñez-Pereira; Carlos Pigrau; Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Ahmet Alanay; Emre R Acaroglu; Frank S Kleinstueck; Ibrahim Obeid; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Impact of Increasing Age on Outcomes of Spinal Fusion in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Terence Verla; Owoicho Adogwa; Ulysses Toche; S Harrison Farber; Frank Petraglia; Kelly R Murphy; Steven Thomas; Parastou Fatemi; Oren Gottfried; Carlos A Bagley; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Neurologic Deficits Have a Negative Impact on Patient-Related Outcomes in Primary Presentation Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis Surgical Treatment at One-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel G Kang; Christine Baldus; Steven D Glassman; Christopher I Shaffrey; Jon D Lurie; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  The aging spine: the effect of vertebral fragility fracture on sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Francesco Langella; Alberto Balestrino; Marco Damilano; Riccardo Cecchinato; Zeno Biber; Marco Paoletta; Giovanni Iolascon; Claudio Lamartina; Giuseppe M Peretti; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.