Justin K Scheer1, Gregory M Mundis2, Eric Klineberg3, Robert A Hart4, Vedat Deviren5, Douglas C Burton6, Themistocles S Protopsaltis7, Munish Gupta3, John D Rolston8, Shay Bess9, Christopher I Shaffrey10, Frank Schwab7, Virginie Lafage7, Justin S Smith10, Christopher P Ames8. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 2210, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. jscheer@ucsd.edu. 2. San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, KS, USA. 7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA. 8. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 9. Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA. 10. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify the effect of complications and reoperation on the recovery process following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery by examining health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures over time via an integrated health state analysis (IHS). METHODS: A retrospective review of a multicenter, prospective ASD database was conducted. Complication number, type, and need for reoperation (REOP) or not (NOREOP) were recorded. Patients were stratified as having no complication (NOCOMP), any complication (COMP), only minor complications (MINOR) and any major complications (MAJOR). HRQOL measures included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS22) at baseline, 6 weeks, 1 and 2 years postoperatively. All HRQOL scores were normalized to each patient's baseline scores and an IHS was then calculated. RESULTS: 149 patients were included. COMP, MINOR, and MAJOR had significantly lower normalized SRS mental scores at 1 and 2 years than NOCOMP (p < 0.05). REOP had significantly worse normalized 1 and 2 year mental component score (MCS), SRS mental, and total score than NOCOMP (p < 0.05). COMP, MINOR, and MAJOR all had significantly lower SRS mental IHSs than NOCOMP (p < 0.05). REOP had significantly lower IHSs for MCS and SRS satisfaction than NOREOP (p < 0.05). REOP had a significantly lower MCS and SRS mental IHS than NOCOMP (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An IHS analysis suggests there was a significantly protracted mental recovery phase associated with patients that had at least one complication, as well as either a minor and major complication. The addition of a reoperation also adversely affected the mental recovery as well as overall satisfaction.
PURPOSE: To identify the effect of complications and reoperation on the recovery process following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery by examining health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures over time via an integrated health state analysis (IHS). METHODS: A retrospective review of a multicenter, prospective ASD database was conducted. Complication number, type, and need for reoperation (REOP) or not (NOREOP) were recorded. Patients were stratified as having no complication (NOCOMP), any complication (COMP), only minor complications (MINOR) and any major complications (MAJOR). HRQOL measures included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS22) at baseline, 6 weeks, 1 and 2 years postoperatively. All HRQOL scores were normalized to each patient's baseline scores and an IHS was then calculated. RESULTS: 149 patients were included. COMP, MINOR, and MAJOR had significantly lower normalized SRS mental scores at 1 and 2 years than NOCOMP (p < 0.05). REOP had significantly worse normalized 1 and 2 year mental component score (MCS), SRS mental, and total score than NOCOMP (p < 0.05). COMP, MINOR, and MAJOR all had significantly lower SRS mental IHSs than NOCOMP (p < 0.05). REOP had significantly lower IHSs for MCS and SRS satisfaction than NOREOP (p < 0.05). REOP had a significantly lower MCS and SRS mental IHS than NOCOMP (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An IHS analysis suggests there was a significantly protracted mental recovery phase associated with patients that had at least one complication, as well as either a minor and major complication. The addition of a reoperation also adversely affected the mental recovery as well as overall satisfaction.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adult spinal deformity; Area under the curve; Complications; HRQOL; Integrated health state; Reoperation
Authors: Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Benjamin Blondel; Jacob Buchowski; Jeffrey Coe; Donald Deinlein; Christopher DeWald; Hossein Mehdian; Christopher Shaffrey; Clifford Tribus; Virginie Lafage Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-05-20 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Doniel Drazin; Ali Shirzadi; Jack Rosner; Paula Eboli; Michael Safee; Eli M Baron; John C Liu; Frank L Acosta Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Samuel K Cho; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Woojin Cho; Lukas P Zebala; Joshua M Pahys; Matthew M Kang; Jin-Seok Yi; Christine R Baldus Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Ryan M Zimmerman; Ahmed S Mohamed; Richard L Skolasky; Malaya D Robinson; Khaled M Kebaish Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Michael D Daubs; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Georgia Stobbs; Keith H Bridwell Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Steven D Glassman; Anne G Copay; Sigurd H Berven; David W Polly; Brian R Subach; Leah Y Carreon Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Steven D Glassman; Christopher L Hamill; Keith H Bridwell; Frank J Schwab; John R Dimar; Thomas G Lowe Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Steven D Glassman; Keith H Bridwell; Christopher I Shaffrey; Charles C Edwards; Jon D Lurie; Christine R Baldus; Leah Y Carreon Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2018-01
Authors: Mitsuru Takemoto; Louis Boissière; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre R Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Susana Núñez-Pereira; Ferran Pellisé; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Ahmet Alanay; Emre Acaraglou; Ibrahim Obeid; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Sleiman Haddad; Susana Núñez-Pereira; Carlos Pigrau; Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Ahmet Alanay; Emre R Acaroglu; Frank S Kleinstueck; Ibrahim Obeid; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Ferran Pellisé Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Emily K Miller; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Brian J Neuman; Daniel M Sciubba; Khaled M Kebaish; Justin S Smith; Ahmet Alanay; Emre R Acaroglu; Frank Kleinstück; Ibrahim Obeid; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Leah Y Carreon; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Justin K Scheer; Virginie Lafage; Christopher I Shaffrey; Ferran Pellisé; Christopher P Ames Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Mitsuru Takemoto; Louis Boissière; Felipe Novoa; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre R Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid; Ibrahim Obeid Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 3.134