Literature DB >> 8578259

Radical prostatectomy versus expectant treatment for early carcinoma of the prostate. Twenty-three year follow-up of a prospective randomized study.

P Iversen1, P O Madsen, D K Corle.   

Abstract

In a study by the Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group (VACURG), 142 patients with localized prostate cancer, VACURG stage I and II, were randomized between radical prostatectomy plus placebo versus placebo alone as initial treatment. 111 patients were evaluable for treatment comparison. Median follow-up for survival is 23 years. The prognostic value of Gleason histologic grading was confirmed. A difference in overall survival in favor of radical prostatectomy was observed in stage I patients. However, after adjustment for imbalance in age distribution, no statistically significant differences in survival could be demonstrated in either stage or in both stages combined. The results are discussed considering the small sample size and the limited statistical power of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8578259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8886


  16 in total

Review 1.  Treatment for PSA screen-detected prostate cancer: what are the options?

Authors:  R Tim D Oliver; David E Neal
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-01-27

2.  Clinical Evidence: Non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  T J Wilt; M K Brawer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-08

3.  Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robin Wm Vernooij; Michelle Lancee; Anne Cleves; Philipp Dahm; Chris H Bangma; Katja Kh Aben
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-04

4.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Michael K Brawer; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; William J Aronson; Steven Fox; Jeffrey R Gingrich; John T Wei; Patricia Gilhooly; B Mayer Grob; Imad Nsouli; Padmini Iyer; Ruben Cartagena; Glenn Snider; Claus Roehrborn; Roohollah Sharifi; William Blank; Parikshit Pandya; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  [Obituary for Prof. Dr. med. Paul Ove Madsen].

Authors:  K G Naber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

7.  Clinical decisions. Screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The potential impact of comparative effectiveness research on U.S. health care expenditures.

Authors:  Daniella J Perlroth; Dana P Goldman; Alan M Garber
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2010

9.  Factors associated with initial treatment and survival for clinically localized prostate cancer: results from the CDC-NPCR Patterns of Care Study (PoC1).

Authors:  Maria J Schymura; Amy R Kahn; Robert R German; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Rosemary D Cress; Jack L Finch; John P Fulton; Tiefu Shen; Erik Stuckart
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Prostate cancer (early).

Authors:  Melissa L James
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2006-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.