Literature DB >> 8577836

Transcriptional repression in the Drosophila embryo.

S Gray1, H Cai, S Barolo, M Levine.   

Abstract

Transcriptional repression is essential for the conversion of crude maternal gradients into sharp territories of tissue differentiation in the Drosophila embryo. Evidence will be presented suggesting that some of the embryonic repressors function through a short-range 'quenching' mechanism, whereby a repressor works over short distances (ca. 50 b.p.) to block neighbouring activators within a target enhancer. This type of repression can explain how different enhancers work autonomously within complex modular promoters. However, at least one of the repressors operating in the early embryo works through a long-range, or silencing, mechanism. The binding of a silencer to a given enhancer leads to the inactivation of all enhancers within a complex promoter. The analysis of chromatin boundary elements suggest that silencers and enhancers might work through distinct mechanisms. We speculate that silencers constrain the evolution of complex promoters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8577836     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  13 in total

1.  Identification of a boundary domain adjacent to the potent human cytomegalovirus enhancer that represses transcription of the divergent UL127 promoter.

Authors:  A Angulo; D Kerry; H Huang; E M Borst; A Razinsky; J Wu; U Hobom; M Messerle; P Ghazal
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  The Rpd3 histone deacetylase is required for segmentation of the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  M Mannervik; M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nkx2.2 repressor complex regulates islet β-cell specification and prevents β-to-α-cell reprogramming.

Authors:  James B Papizan; Ruth A Singer; Shuen-Ing Tschen; Sangeeta Dhawan; Jessica M Friel; Susan B Hipkens; Mark A Magnuson; Anil Bhushan; Lori Sussel
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Transcriptional repression via antilooping in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Vivek S Chopra; Nikki Kong; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors.

Authors:  J R Ryu; L K Olson; D N Arnosti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  dCtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of the Drosophila Knirps protein.

Authors:  S A Keller; Y Mao; P Struffi; C Margulies; C E Yurk; A R Anderson; R L Amey; S Moore; J M Ebels; K Foley; M Corado; D N Arnosti
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Drosophila CtBP: a Hairy-interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and hairy-mediated transcriptional repression.

Authors:  G Poortinga; M Watanabe; S M Parkhurst
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Combinatorial binding leads to diverse regulatory responses: Lmd is a tissue-specific modulator of Mef2 activity.

Authors:  Paulo M F Cunha; Thomas Sandmann; E Hilary Gustafson; Lucia Ciglar; Michael P Eichenlaub; Eileen E M Furlong
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  CtBP-independent repression in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Yutaka Nibu; Kate Senger; Michael Levine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Groucho augments the repression of multiple Even skipped target genes in establishing parasegment boundaries.

Authors:  M Kobayashi; R E Goldstein; M Fujioka; Z Paroush; J B Jaynes
Journal:  Development       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.