Literature DB >> 8575241

Post-stroke antihypertensive treatment study. A preliminary result.

.   

Abstract

Post-stroke Antihypertensive Treatment Study (PATS) was a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial, which aimed at determining whether antihypertensive treatment could reduce the risk of fatal and nonfatal stroke incidence in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). 5,665 patients were randomized by a sealed envelope system. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) ranged from 80 to 280 mm Hg and diastolic (DBP) from 50 to 150 mmHg. The average SBP was 154 mmHg and average DBP 93 mmHg. The mean age was 60 years. Among the patients, women accounted for 28%. In 71% the latest stroke was ischemic. Average follow-up approximated to 2 years. The three-year average SBP was 149 mmHg for the placebo group and 144 mmHg for the indapamide treatment group, and the three-year DBP was 89 mmHg and 87 mmHg respectively. The three-year first incidence of fatal and nonfatal stroke was 12.3 per 100 patients placebo treatment and 9.4 per 100 with indapamide. The relative risk by proportional hazards regression analysis was 0.71 (P = 0.0009). For deaths from all causes, the relative risk was 0.91. (P > 0.05). The findings of this trial indicate that in patients with a history of stroke or TIA, blood pressure reduction of 5/2 mmHg with 2.5 mg indapamide reduced the first incidence of fatal and nonfatal stroke by 29%, with three-year absolute benefit of 29 events per 1000 participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8575241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  70 in total

Review 1.  Is blood pressure reduction a valid surrogate endpoint for stroke prevention? An analysis incorporating a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, a by-trial weighted errors-in-variables regression, the surrogate threshold effect (STE) and the Biomarker-Surrogacy (BioSurrogate) Evaluation Schema (BSES).

Authors:  Marissa N Lassere; Kent R Johnson; Michal Schiff; David Rees
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 2.  Risk factor thresholds: their existence under scrutiny.

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

3.  Secondary prevention for stroke and transient ischaemic attacks.

Authors:  Keith W Muir
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-07

4.  [Diuretics in the treatment of hypertension. Efficacy, safety and tolerability].

Authors:  R Düsing
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Early and sustained blood pressure control is necessary for stroke prevention.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Antihypertensive therapy in the prevention of stroke: what, when and for whom?

Authors:  M D Fotherby; B Panayiotou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  The PROGRESS trial three years later: time for a balanced report of effectiveness.

Authors:  Richard Wennberg; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-23

Review 8.  Primary and secondary prevention of stroke by antihypertensive treatment in clinical trials.

Authors:  Guido Grassi; Francesca Arenare; Fosca Quarti Trevano; Raffaella Dell'Oro; And Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 9.  The Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS): clinical implications for older patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Yogini Ratnasabapathy; Carlene M M Lawes; Craig S Anderson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Antihypertensive treatment and stroke prevention: from recent meta-analyses to the PRoFESS trial.

Authors:  Guido Grassi; Fosca Quarti-Trevano; Raffaella Dell'oro; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.