Literature DB >> 8574308

Effects of practice with and without knowledge of results on jitter and shimmer levels in normally speaking women.

C T Ferrand1.   

Abstract

The effects of practice on jitter and shimmer were assessed in two groups of normally speaking women. Subjects in both groups sustained trials of /a/ as steadily as possible during a baseline session, two practice sessions, and a transfer session. Subjects in one group received visual and verbal feedback during the practice sessions. Subjects in the other group received no feedback. Shimmer means remained essentially stable over the four sessions for both groups, and no differences were apparent between the groups. Jitter values were significantly different between sessions for both groups, and between the two groups for the practice sessions. These results are consistent with findings from manual performance and retention tasks. The present findings also support a recently developed neurologic model of jitter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8574308     DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80204-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  7 in total

1.  Objective methods of sample selection in acoustic analysis of voice.

Authors:  Aleksandra E Olszewski; Lisa Shen; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  The effect of segment selection on acoustic analysis.

Authors:  Seong Hee Choi; Jiyeoun Lee; Alicia J Sprecher; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.

Authors:  Benjamin Ehrlich; Liyu Lin; Jack Jiang
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Measuring vocal motor skill with a virtual voice-controlled slingshot.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Se-Woong Park; Matthew Jarvis; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback: Relative Frequency and Summary Feedback Effects on Performance and Retention of Reduced Vocal Intensity in the Daily Lives of Participants With Normal Voices.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Dagmar Sternad; Robert Petit; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Effect of Voice Ambulatory Biofeedback on the Daily Performance and Retention of a Modified Vocal Motor Behavior in Participants With Normal Voices.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Integration of Motor Learning Principles Into Real-Time Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback and Example Implementation Via a Clinical Case Study With Vocal Fold Nodules.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert J Petit; Dagmar Sternad; Jason Muise; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.408

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.