Literature DB >> 8572773

Impact of mechanical heart valve prosthesis sound on patients' quality of life.

S A Blome-Eberwein1, D Mrowinski, J Hofmeister, R Hetzer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The "click" sound of mechanical heart valve prostheses has been recognized as a disturbing factor for some patients after mechanical heart valve implantation. The factors determining the extent of disturbance remain controversial.
METHODS: Ninety-five unmatched patients with six different valve types were examined (Duromedics-Edwards, Björk-Shiley, St. Jude Medical, Medtronic, CarboMedics, and Omnicarbon), including 12 patients with double-valve replacement. Three groups (Björk-Shiley, Duromedics-Edwards, and St. Jude Medical) were comparable in size. All patients were examined and interviewed, a hearing test was performed, and valve sounds were analyzed. Sound transmission was evaluated.
RESULTS: The loudest valve was the Duromedics-Edwards prosthesis (mean, 84.2 dB[A] impulse) and the St. Jude Medical was the quietest (mean, 73.5 dB[A] impulse). This ranking was independent of patient variables and valve position. Discomfort level correlated with hearing loss and loudness of the valve. Patients desiring a quieter valve had better hearing, had louder valve sounds, felt disturbed by the sound, had partners who felt disturbed, and were receiving coumarin for anticoagulation. Sound was transmitted predominantly by air conduction. The frequency analysis to identify different valves was unsatisfactory, but louder frequencies did correspond with hearing-impaired patients' audiograms.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the need for valve design changes, preoperative education about the sound, and inclusion of routine hearing tests into the preoperative workup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8572773     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00937-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Bileaflet mechanical heart valve closing sounds: in vitro classification by phonocardiographic analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Bagno; Federico Anzil; Roberto Buselli; Elena Pesavento; Vincenzo Tarzia; Vittorio Pengo; Tomaso Bottio; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Comparative classification of thrombotic formations on bileaflet mechanical heart valves by phonographic analysis.

Authors:  Clemens Romata; Francesca Maria Susin; Andrea Cambi; Vincenzo Tarzia; Vittorio Pengo; Gino Gerosa; Andrea Bagno
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Phonographic detection of mechanical heart valve thrombosis.

Authors:  Simone Tosoni; Vincenzo Tarzia; Andrea Colli; Gino Gerosa; Andrea Bagno
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Comparison of quality of life in patients who underwent mechanical mitral valve replacement: star GK vs SJM.

Authors:  Jiang-Shan Huang; Ning Xu; Kai-Peng Sun; Zhi-Nuan Hong; Liang-Wan Chen; Yur-Ren Kuo; Qiang Chen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Quality of life in sexagenarians after aortic biological vs mechanical valve replacement: a single-center study in China.

Authors:  Li-Wen Wang; Ning Xu; Shu-Ting Huang; Liang-Wan Chen; Hua Cao; Qiang Chen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.