Literature DB >> 8572359

Prospective examination of epidural catheter insertion.

R D'Angelo1, B L Berkebile, J C Gerancher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although it is generally accepted that inserting epidural catheters 3-4 cm into the epidural space minimizes complications, no prospective randomized examination of epidural catheter insertion length has been published.
METHODS: Eight hundred healthy parturients requesting epidural analgesia were randomized to have open-tip epidural catheters inserted 2, 4, 6, or 8 cm within the epidural space. The incidences of intravenous cannulation, unilateral sensory analgesia, and subsequent catheter dislodgment were recorded. Catheter insertions that resulted in intravenous cannulation or unilateral analgesia were incrementally withdrawn and retested with additional local anesthetic to determine the effectiveness of epidural catheter manipulation.
RESULTS: Epidural catheters inserted 8 cm within the epidural space were more likely to result in intravenous cannulation. Epidural catheters inserted 2 cm within the epidural space were less likely to result in unilateral sensory analgesia but were more likely to become dislodged. Twenty-three percent of epidural catheters inserted > 2 cm within the epidural space required manipulation. Epidural catheters inserted 2 or 4 cm required replacement more often than epidural catheters inserted 6 or 8 cm. Ninety-one percent and 50% of epidural catheters that resulted in unilateral sensory analgesia and intravenous cannulation, respectively, provided analgesia for labor and delivery after incremental withdrawal.
CONCLUSIONS: Epidural catheters should be inserted either 2 cm when rapid labor is anticipated or 6 cm when prolonged labor or cesarean delivery is likely. Additionally, epidural catheters that result in intravenous cannulation or unilateral sensory analgesia can be manipulated effectively to provide analgesia for labor and delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8572359     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199601000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

1.  Strategies to prevent intravascular placement of epidural catheter.

Authors:  Kesavan Sadacharam; Subramanya S Bandi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Why epidurals do not always work.

Authors:  Katherine Arendt; Scott Segal
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

3.  Transient brachial monoparesis following epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Tejesh C Anandaswamy; Manjunath A Chikkapillappa; Geetha C Rajappa; Shivakumar Shivanna
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10

4.  Algorithm for the anesthetic management of cesarean delivery in patients with unsatisfactory labor epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Sonia Vaida; Davide Cattano; Debra Hurwitz; Berend Mets
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-04-24

5.  Predicting postoperative vomiting among orthopedic patients receiving patient-controlled epidural analgesia using SVM and LR.

Authors:  Hsin-Yun Wu; Cihun-Siyong Alex Gong; Shih-Pin Lin; Kuang-Yi Chang; Mei-Yung Tsou; Chien-Kun Ting
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Accidental knotting and subsequent removal of a catheter from the epidural space in an adult cow: a case report.

Authors:  Graeme M Doodnaught; Caroline Constant; André Desrochers; Daniel S J Pang
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-07

7.  Predicting postoperative vomiting for orthopedic patients receiving patient-controlled epidural analgesia with the application of an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Cihun-Siyong Alex Gong; Lu Yu; Chien-Kun Ting; Mei-Yung Tsou; Kuang-Yi Chang; Chih-Long Shen; Shih-Pin Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.