Literature DB >> 8568660

Perception of movement at the human ankle: effects of leg position.

K M Refshauge1, R C Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

1. Recent studies show that subjects perceive smaller ankle movements when they are upright in the standing position than when they are seated. To examine this improvement, the ability to perceive ankle movements was tested in five positions of body, knee and ankle. Subjects reported the direction of slow ramp movements of the ankles. 2. The threshold for perceiving ankle movements was unchanged when only one ankle was moved rather than both together. When seated with the knees bent and ankles slightly plantarflexed, subjects perceived movements of 0.65 deg at 0.05 deg s-1. However, when upright or when seated with their knees and ankles in the standing position, subjects perceived movements that were one-third of this size. 3. These findings show that the knee and ankle positions, rather than being upright, explain the better performance in the standing position. During standing, knee extension and ankle dorsiflexion stretch the calf muscles. Thus, enhanced input from intramuscular stretch receptors appears responsible for the better performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8568660      PMCID: PMC1156717          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  13 in total

1.  The response to stretch of human intercostal muscle spindles studied in vitro.

Authors:  J N Davis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Weber fractions for weight and mass as a function of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  H E Ross; E E Brodie
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1987-02

3.  The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length.

Authors:  P B Matthews; R B Stein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  The contribution of articular receptors to proprioception with the fingers in humans.

Authors:  F J Clark; P Grigg; J W Chapin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Responses to passive movement of receptors in joint, skin and muscle of the human hand.

Authors:  D Burke; S C Gandevia; G Macefield
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Tendon organ firing during active muscle lengthening in awake, normally behaving cats.

Authors:  K Appenteng; A Prochazka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints.

Authors:  L A Hall; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Perceptual responses to microstimulation of single afferents innervating joints, muscles and skin of the human hand.

Authors:  G Macefield; S C Gandevia; D Burke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position.

Authors:  F J Clark; R C Burgess; J W Chapin; W T Lipscomb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  11 in total

1.  Pronounced overestimation of support surface tilt during stance.

Authors:  C Maurer; G Schweigart; T Mergner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Detection of simultaneous movement at two human arm joints.

Authors:  Daina L Sturnieks; Julie R Wright; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Sensorimotor system measurement techniques.

Authors:  Bryan L Riemann; Joseph B Myers; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Noise-enhanced kinaesthesia: a psychophysical and microneurographic study.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Valérie Hospod; Jean-Marc Aimonetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Age-related differences in postural control: effects of the complexity of visual manipulation and sensorimotor contribution to postural performance.

Authors:  Diana R Toledo; José A Barela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Directional acuity of whole-body perturbations during standing balance.

Authors:  M Jane Puntkattalee; Clarissa J Whitmire; Alix S Macklin; Garrett B Stanley; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Difference in knee joint position sense in athletes with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Nasrin Naseri; Fereshteh Pourkazemi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Treatment of common deficits associated with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Alison Holmes; Eamonn Delahunt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Kinesthesia Is Not Affected by Functional Ankle Instability Status.

Authors:  Tricia J Hubbard; Thomas W Kaminski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Ankle instability effects on joint position sense when stepping across the active movement extent discrimination apparatus.

Authors:  Jeremy Witchalls; Gordon Waddington; Peter Blanch; Roger Adams
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.