Literature DB >> 16132967

Pronounced overestimation of support surface tilt during stance.

C Maurer1, G Schweigart, T Mergner.   

Abstract

A veridical internal notion of the kinematic state of the foot support is essential for postural control. The means by which this is obtained is still a matter of debate. We therefore measured the conscious perception of support tilt during transient anterior-posterior rotations of a motion platform in six healthy subjects, using a psychophysical matching procedure. Furthermore, we evaluated subjects' postural responses (in terms of displacement of subjects' center of mass, COM, and their ankle torque, as represented by the center of foot pressure, COP). The platform tilts were applied in absence of visual and auditory orientation cues. The platform rotations consisted of smoothed position ramps with different dominant frequencies (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 Hz) and different amplitudes (0.125 degrees, 0.25 degrees, 0.5 degrees, 1 degree, 2 degrees, 4 degrees, and 8 degrees) for the forward and backward directions, which yielded a 6x14 stimulus matrix. The stimuli were repeated five times in a random order. For the matching procedure, subjects tried to maintain an upright body orientation, while trying to orient a light-weight rod, which was attached to a belt around their waists, parallel to the perceived platform surface. We measured the stimulus-evoked angular excursions of the rod and of the subjects' COM as well as the COP shift. We found that the subjects' rod indications overestimated the platform tilts, particularly with small stimulus amplitudes. To characterize the overestimation, we compared the rod indications obtained while subjects stood on the tilting platform, to rod indications in a situation in which they stood next to the platform and tried to match the rod angle to the now visually perceived platform angle. From this comparison, we inferred that the subjects' kinesthetically derived notion of platform tilt overestimates the actual tilt by a factor of approximately 4. The estimates were linearly related to the angle between body (COM) and platform, i.e., to approximately the angle of the ankle joint, a finding which suggests a proprioceptive source of the overestimation. Further analyses supported this view; they showed that the onset latencies of the rod indications could be approximated by a theoretical indication mechanism with a reaction time of about 0.31 s, a velocity threshold of 0.099 degrees/s, and a displacement threshold of 0.12 degrees. These threshold values are well in line with previous work on the leg proprioceptive detection threshold of conscious perception of body sway. We therefore assume that the phenomenon of support tilt overestimation reflects a still unknown mechanism of leg proprioception in postural control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132967     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0087-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Contribution of ankle, knee, and hip joints to the perception threshold for support surface rotation.

Authors:  N Teasdale; V Nougier; P A Barraud; C Bourdin; B Debû; D Poquin; C Raphel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-05

2.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task-dependent components.

Authors:  R C Fitzpatrick; J L Taylor; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Vestibular, visual, and somatosensory contributions to human control of upright stance.

Authors:  C Maurer; T Mergner; B Bolha; F Hlavacka
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Psychophysical determination of coordinate representation of human arm orientation.

Authors:  J F Soechting; B Ross
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Ankle joint proprioception and passive mechanical properties of the calf muscles after an Achilles tendon rupture: a comparison with matched controls.

Authors:  Eadric Bressel; Brian T Larsen; Peter J McNair; John Cronin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position.

Authors:  F J Clark; R C Burgess; J W Chapin; W T Lipscomb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Object motion perception is shaped by the motor control mechanism of ocular pursuit.

Authors:  G Schweigart; T Mergner; G R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Human perception of horizontal trunk and head rotation in space during vestibular and neck stimulation.

Authors:  T Mergner; C Siebold; G Schweigart; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  Interaction of posture and conscious perception of gravitational vertical and surface horizontal.

Authors:  W Geoffrey Wright; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Human stance control beyond steady state response and inverted pendulum simplification.

Authors:  G Schweigart; T Mergner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Quiet stance control is affected by prior treadmill but not overground locomotion.

Authors:  Carlo Zanetti; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Elderly Use Proprioception Rather than Visual and Vestibular Cues for Postural Motor Control.

Authors:  Isabella Katharina Wiesmeier; Daniela Dalin; Christoph Maurer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Impaired perception of surface tilt in progressive supranuclear palsy.

Authors:  Marian L Dale; Fay B Horak; W Geoffrey Wright; Bernadette M Schoneburg; John G Nutt; Martina Mancini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Reliance on Vestibular Information During Standing Balance Control Decreases With Severity of Vestibular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Joost van Kordelaar; Jantsje H Pasma; Massimo Cenciarini; Alfred C Schouten; Herman van der Kooij; Christoph Maurer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.