Literature DB >> 8567854

Cryopreservation: the problem of evaluation.

H W Jones1, L L Veeck, S J Muasher.   

Abstract

A simple evaluatory formula for reporting pregnancy rates involving cryopreserved material has so far remained elusive. It is highly desirable to have a method which would allow not only an evaluation of cryotechnology per se, but also an evaluation of the role of cryotechnology in enhancing the total reproductive potential of a single cycle. In this paper, nine separate formulae are described which can be used for the evaluation of cryopreservation. It is concluded that none of the existing formulae used alone expresses the total potential of cryopreservation, and that while each formula provides information regarding some aspect of the role of cryopreservation, the most comprehensive evaluation requires the answer to five different equations. The other four formulae, while often used, are regarded as providing information which is unsubstantiated or does not allow complete evaluation.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8567854     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  The added value of embryo cryopreservation to cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates per IVF treatment: is cryopreservation worth the effort?

Authors:  D de Jong; M J C Eijkemans; N G M Beckers; R V Pruijsten; B C J M Fauser; N S Macklon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Cryopreservation of mouse embryos at morula/compact stage.

Authors:  J Tao; R Tamis; K Fink
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Success of frozen embryo transfer: Does the type of gonadotropin influence the outcome?

Authors:  Hesham Al-Inany; Pieter van Gelder
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

4.  Comparing thaw survival, implantation and live birth rates from cryopreserved zygotes, embryos and blastocysts.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Pavone; Joy Innes; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Ralph Kazer; John Zhang
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-01

5.  Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3?

Authors:  Dominic Stoop; Lisbet Van Landuyt; Etienne Van den Abbeel; Michel Camus; Greta Verheyen; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Long-Term Storage Does Not Affect the Expression Profiles of mRNA and Long Non-Coding RNA in Vitrified-Warmed Human Embryos.

Authors:  Jingyu Li; Ling Zhu; Jin Huang; Weiwei Liu; Wei Han; Guoning Huang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Effects of vitrified cryopreservation duration on IVF and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Yuling Mao; Ni Tang; Yanfen Luo; Ping Yin; Lei Li
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.506

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.