Literature DB >> 8566548

A quantitative assessment of the role of the chaperonin proteins in protein folding in vivo.

G H Lorimer1.   

Abstract

In vitro the chaperonin proteins, GroEL and GroES, facilitate the folding of some other proteins under conditions where that process does not occur spontaneously. Using values drawn from a number of such in vitro studies, together with the known rates of in vivo protein synthesis by Escherichia coli and the known quantities of GroEL and GroES in E. coli, an assessment of the general role of these proteins in protein folding in vivo has been made. Three specific cases are examined, where compelling evidence points to the involvement of the chaperonins; the in vivo folding of the bacteriophage coat protein during the burst phase of phage morphogenesis and of Rubisco during chloroplast development and during expression of recombinant Rubisco in E. coli. In each case the maximum in vitro rates are nearly sufficient to account for the observed in vivo rates of formation of the native protein. However, in general, there appears to be sufficient GroEL and GroES to facilitate the folding of no more than 5% of all of the proteins within E. coli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8566548     DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.10.1.8566548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  43 in total

1.  Distinguishing between sequential and nonsequentially folded proteins: implications for folding and misfolding.

Authors:  C J Tsai; J V Maizel; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  GroES in the asymmetric GroEL14-GroES7 complex exchanges via an associative mechanism.

Authors:  P M Horowitz; G H Lorimer; J Ybarra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Chaperonin 60 unfolds its secrets of cellular communication.

Authors:  Maria Maguire; Anthony R M Coates; Brian Henderson
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 4.  Protein folding.

Authors:  M A Basharov
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 5.  Capturing the essence of folding and functions of biomolecules using coarse-grained models.

Authors:  Changbong Hyeon; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Global aggregation of newly translated proteins in an Escherichia coli strain deficient of the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Eli Chapman; George W Farr; Renata Usaite; Krystyna Furtak; Wayne A Fenton; Tapan K Chaudhuri; Elise R Hondorp; Rowena G Matthews; Sharon G Wolf; John R Yates; Marc Pypaert; Arthur L Horwich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Asymmetry of the GroEL-GroES complex under physiological conditions as revealed by small-angle x-ray scattering.

Authors:  Tomonao Inobe; Kazunobu Takahashi; Kosuke Maki; Sawako Enoki; Kiyoto Kamagata; Akio Kadooka; Munehito Arai; Kunihiro Kuwajima
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Identifying natural substrates for chaperonins using a sequence-based approach.

Authors:  George Stan; Bernard R Brooks; George H Lorimer; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle.

Authors:  Tomoya Sameshima; Taro Ueno; Ryo Iizuka; Noriyuki Ishii; Naofumi Terada; Kohki Okabe; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones.

Authors:  J Chatellier; F Hill; P A Lund; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.