Literature DB >> 8565980

Role of agonist and antagonist muscle strength in performance of rapid movements.

S Jarić1, R Ropret, M Kukolj, D B Ilić.   

Abstract

Six subjects performed rapid self-terminated elbow movements under different mechanical conditions prior to, and 5 weeks after an elbow extensor strengthening programme. Despite the large difference in the strengths of elbow flexors and extensors, the pretest did not demonstrate significant differences between the movement time of flexion and extension movements performed under the same mechanical conditions. The results obtained in the posttest demonstrated a decrease in movement time (i.e. an increase in movement speed) in both elbow flexion and extension movements under some mechanical conditions. In addition, flexion movements demonstrated a relative increase in the acceleration time (acceleration time as a proportion of the movement time). It was concluded that the strength of both the agonist and antagonist muscles was important for the performance of rapid movements. Stronger agonists could increase the acceleration of the limb being moved, while stronger antagonists could facilitate the arrest of the limb movement in a shorter time, providing a longer time for acceleration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8565980     DOI: 10.1007/bf00635882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  13 in total

1.  Role of concentric force in limiting improvement in muscular strength.

Authors:  T Hortobágyi; F I Katch
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-02

2.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. I. A speed-insensitive strategy.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb; D M Corcos; G C Agarwal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Antagonist muscle activity during human forearm movements under varying kinematic and loading conditions.

Authors:  G M Karst; Z Hasan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements.

Authors:  F Lestienne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-05-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Principles for learning single-joint movements. I. Enhanced performance by practice.

Authors:  D M Corcos; S Jaric; G C Agarwal; G L Gottlieb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Principles for learning single-joint movements. II. Generalizing a learned behavior.

Authors:  S Jaric; D M Corcos; G C Agarwal; G L Gottlieb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Changes in rowing ergometer, weight lifting, vertical jump and isokinetic performance in response to standard and standard plus plyometric training programs.

Authors:  J F Kramer; A Morrow; A Leger
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Generality versus specificity: a comparison of dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength.

Authors:  D Baker; G Wilson; B Carlyon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

9.  The function of the antagonist muscle during fast limb movements in man.

Authors:  C D Marsden; J A Obeso; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Effects of weak antagonist on fast elbow flexion movements in man.

Authors:  M M Wierzbicka; A W Wiegner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: fundamental concepts for training and sports performance.

Authors:  David M Frost; John Cronin; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  A comparison of the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity between pneumatic and free weight resistance.

Authors:  David Michael Frost; John Barry Cronin; Robert Usher Newton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Predicting vertical jump height from bar velocity.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Igor Štirn; Paulino Padial; Javier Argüelles-Cienfuegos; Blanca De la Fuente; Vojko Strojnik; Belén Feriche
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Upper body push and pull strength ratio in recreationally active adults.

Authors:  Rodney J Negrete; William J Hanney; Patrick Pabian; Morey J Kolber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-04

5.  Greater impairment of extension movements as compared to flexion movements in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Julie A Robichaud; Kerstin D Pfann; Cynthia L Comella; Melanie Brandabur; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Relationships among the muscle strength properties as assessed through various tests and variables.

Authors:  Goran Prebeg; Ivan Cuk; Dejan Suzovic; Stanimir Stojiljkovic; Dusan Mitic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Reliability Analysis of Traditional and Ballistic Bench Press Exercises at Different Loads.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Paulino Padial; Miguel García-Ramos; Javier Conde-Pipó; Javier Argüelles-Cienfuegos; Igor Štirn; Belén Feriche
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.193

8.  Determination of a strength index for upper body local endurance strength in sedentary individuals: a cross sectional analysis.

Authors:  Ewan Thomas; Antonino Bianco; Marianna Bellafiore; Giuseppe Battaglia; Antonio Paoli; Antonio Palma
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-11-25

Review 9.  Spinal and supraspinal control of motor function during maximal eccentric muscle contraction: Effects of resistance training.

Authors:  Per Aagaard
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 7.179

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.