Literature DB >> 8565971

Heart rate and oxygen uptake relationship: a comparison of loaded marching and running in women.

M P Rayson1, A Davies, D G Bell, E S Rhodes-James.   

Abstract

Heart rate (beats.min-1; fc) measured during marching with a load is often used to predict the oxygen cost (l.min-1; VO2) of the activity. The prediction comes from the fc/VO2 relationship determined from laboratory measures of fc and VO2 during treadmill running. Studies in men have suggested that this may not be appropriate although this has yet to be examined in women. This study, therefore, compared the fc/VO2 relationship between loaded marching and maximal running protocols in women. Sixteen female subjects [mean (SD), age 21.9 (2.3) years, height 6 (0.06) m, weight 62.6 (7.6) kg] had their fc (from three-lead chest electrodes) and VO2 measured first during standard treadmill run protocols, and again 1 week later during loaded marching protocols. The slopes and intercepts determined from linear regression of fc on VO2 for each individual for each protocol were compared as were the maximal fc(fcmax), VO2 and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) from the last work period of each protocol in paired t-tests. The fc/VO2 slopes (P < 0.01) and intercepts (P < 0.05) differed significantly between loaded marching and running. fcmax for loaded marching were 90% of fcmax for running (P < 0.01) and VO2peak for loaded marching were 80% of those for running (P < 0.01). However, RPE at the final levels for the two protocols were not significantly different. The data suggest that in women the fc/VO2 relationships for loaded marching and for running are different. This difference is similar to that found in men when speed is held constant and the load and gradient are varied. The results suggest that it would be erroneous to use fc and VO2 measured during running protocols in the laboratory to estimate energy expenditure and work intensity during loaded marching in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8565971     DOI: 10.1007/bf00635873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  16 in total

1.  Some effects of restriction of chest cage expansion on pulmonary function in man: an experimental study.

Authors:  C G CARO; J BUTLER; A B DUBOIS
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Cardiac output during submaximal and maximal treadmill and bicycle exercise.

Authors:  L Hermansen; B Ekblom; B Saltin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  The physiological cost of carrying light and heavy loads.

Authors:  W S Myles; P L Saunders
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1979-10

4.  Comparison of different methods of load carriage.

Authors:  S J Legg
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Comparison between load carriage and grade walking on a treadmill.

Authors:  M J Gordon; B R Goslin; T Graham; J Hoare
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Comparison of five modes of carrying a load close to the trunk.

Authors:  S J Legg; A Mahanty
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Differentiated perceptions of exertion and energy cost of young women while carrying loads.

Authors:  R J Robertson; C J Caspersen; T G Allison; G S Skrinar; R A Abbott; K F Metz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1982

8.  Self-pacing during sustained, repetitive exercise.

Authors:  W S Myles; J P Eclache; J Beaury
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1979-09

9.  The energy cost of walking and running with and without a backpack load.

Authors:  G Keren; Y Epstein; A Magazanik; E Sohar
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1981

10.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimating relative physical workload using heart rate monitoring: a validation by whole-body indirect calorimetry.

Authors:  Martin Garet; Gil Boudet; Christophe Montaurier; Michel Vermorel; Jean Coudert; Alain Chamoux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A comparison between ventilation and heart rate as indicator of oxygen uptake during different intensities of exercise.

Authors:  Steven Gastinger; Anthony Sorel; Guillaume Nicolas; Arlette Gratas-Delamarche; Jacques Prioux
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Are wearable heart rate measurements accurate to estimate aerobic energy cost during low-intensity resistance exercise?

Authors:  Victor M Reis; Jeferson M Vianna; Tiago M Barbosa; Nuno Garrido; Jose Vilaça Alves; André L Carneiro; Felipe J Aidar; Jefferson Novaes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.