Literature DB >> 8565831

The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy.

D N Arnosti1, S Barolo, M Levine, S Small.   

Abstract

Previous studies have provided a detailed model for the regulation of even-skipped (eve) stripe 2 expression in the Drosophila embryo. The bicoid (bcd) regulatory gradient triggers the expression of hunchback (hb); these work synergistically to activate the stripe in the anterior half of the embryo, bcd also coordinates the expression of two repressors, giant (gt) and Kruppel (Kr), which define the anterior and posterior borders of the stripe, respectively. Here, we report the findings of extensive cis- and trans- complementation analyses using a series of defective stripe 2 enhancers in transgenic embryos. This study reaches two primary conclusions. First, the strip 2 enhancer is inherently 'sensitized' for repression by gt. We propose that gt specifies the sharp anterior stripe border by blocking two tiers of transcriptional synergy, cooperative binding to DNA and cooperative contact of bound activators with the transcription complex. Second, we find that the synergistic activity of hb and bcd is 'promiscuous'. For example, a maternally expressed Gal4-Sp1 fusion protein can functionally replace hb in the stripe 2 enhancer. This finding challenges previous proposals for dedicated hb and bcd interactions in the segmentation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8565831     DOI: 10.1242/dev.122.1.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  97 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of gene function in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  W D Tracey; X Ning; M Klingler; S G Kramer; J P Gergen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Exploiting transcription factor binding site clustering to identify cis-regulatory modules involved in pattern formation in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Benjamin P Berman; Yutaka Nibu; Barret D Pfeiffer; Pavel Tomancak; Susan E Celniker; Michael Levine; Gerald M Rubin; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A Drosophila IkappaB kinase complex required for Relish cleavage and antibacterial immunity.

Authors:  N Silverman; R Zhou; S Stöven; N Pandey; D Hultmark; T Maniatis
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  On schemes of combinatorial transcription logic.

Authors:  Nicolas E Buchler; Ulrich Gerland; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  An anteroposterior Dorsal gradient in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  A M Huang; J Rusch; M Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Coordinate enhancers share common organizational features in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Albert Erives; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors.

Authors:  Leonid A Mirny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Quantitatively predictable control of Drosophila transcriptional enhancers in vivo with engineered transcription factors.

Authors:  Justin Crocker; Garth R Ilsley; David L Stern
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  The origin of subfunctions and modular gene regulation.

Authors:  Allan Force; William A Cresko; F Bryan Pickett; Steven R Proulx; Chris Amemiya; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Anterior-posterior positional information in the absence of a strong Bicoid gradient.

Authors:  Amanda Ochoa-Espinosa; Danyang Yu; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Paolo Struffi; Stephen Small
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.