Literature DB >> 8563988

Mitral valve procedures in ischemic regurgitation.

R Dion1, R Benetis, B Elias, T Guennaoui, D Raphael, M Van Dyck, P Noirhomme, J L Van Overschelde.   

Abstract

A restrictive definition of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) has allowed us to select a more uniform cohort of 41 patients having undergone mitral valve surgery for IMR between January 1993 and March 1995. Thirty-six patients (88%) presented with chronic and five with acute IMR. All patients had at least one significant stenosis in the circumflex area. Left ventricular ejection fraction averaged 35%. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed a > or = 3+ MR in 30 patients and an intermittent, fluctuating or grade 2+ MR in 11 (27%). Annulus dilatation was found in all cases, and it was the only mechanism in 10 (24.4%). Leaflet restrictive motion was clearly seen in 17 cases (41.5%) and leaflet prolapse in 14 (34%). In doubtful cases, an intra-operative dynamic testing using TEE, and associating a loading test and an afterload test, led to the indication of a valve procedure in 11/19 patients (58%). An average of three distal coronary anastomoses per patient were constructed. Mitral valve replacement (MVR) was unavoidable in four patients (9.8%); at least the posterior leaflet subvalvular apparatus was preserved in all. Repair of the mitral valve (Mvrep) was achieved in 37 cases (90%). Ring annuloplasty alone was performed in 27 cases (73%). In the remaining 10 cases, leaflet prolapse was corrected by various artifices such as flip-over technique, quadrangular resection, papillary muscle plication or commissuroplasty. At the 10th postoperative day, a residual MR was found in 4/34 cases (11.8%), only after isolated ring annuloplasty. The four patients who have died in the ICU after MVrep belonged to the same group of isolated ring annuloplasty; this mortality of 4/27 (14.8%) illustrates the mediocre prognosis of marked annulus dilatation and impaired LV function with restrictive leaflet motion. Overall, the hospital mortality (14.6%) more reflected the mode of presentation of the patients than the type of operative technique: when a short and definitive procedure is required by a precarious general condition, one should not hesitate to prefer a rapid MVR to a complicated repair. At 4.5 months, there was no significant improvement in LV dimensions. At six months, 80.5% of the patients survived, with 88% of them being in NYHA class I or II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8563988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  6 in total

Review 1.  Trends in the surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Chad E Hamner; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Late outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Satsuki Fukushima; Junjiro Kobayashi; Ko Bando; Kazuo Niwaya; Osamu Tagusari; Hiroyuki Nakajima; Soichiro Kitamura
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-07

3.  Concomitant mitral valve repair and left ventricular reconstruction in a patient with chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation and inferior left ventricular aneurysm.

Authors:  Hidehito Sakaguchi; Tetsuji Kawata; Shigeki Taniguchi
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-02

4.  The outcome and criteria for mitral valve surgery in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Atsushi Yamaguchi; Koji Kawahito; Hideo Adachi; Takashi Ino
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-09

5.  Management-oriented classification of mitral valve regurgitation.

Authors:  Reida El Oakley; Aijaz Shah
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-14

6.  Mitral valve repair for ischemic moderate mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Faruk Toktas; Senol Yavuz; Kadir K Ozsin; Umut S Sanri
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.484

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.