OBJECTIVES: Although ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is one of the most important issues to determine therapeutic strategy for ischemic heart disease, long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for IMR is still unclear. It is also controversial how patients who would benefit from mitral valve (MV) surgery in combination with CABG should be identified. The purpose of this study is to elucidate late outcomes after isolated CABG for moderate IMR and to assess the indication of combined MV surgery. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients who had grade 2 or 3 IMR preoperatively and underwent isolated CABG between 1980 and 2002 in our institute were enrolled. Mitral regurgitation was assessed by 2-dimensional Doppler echocardiography and left ventriculography. Among them, 84 patients (30.1%) had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 30% and 186 patients (66.7%) had prior inferior myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients (46.2%) remained grade 2 or greater MR early postoperatively. Actuarial survival and freedom from cardiac events, analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, were 90.9% and 87.7% at 1 year, 79.2% and 68.8% at 5 years, 54.9% and 49.1% at 10 years and 48.8% and 18.9% at 15 years. Independent predictive risk factors for cardiac events, analyzed by multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model, were grade 2 or greater MR which remained early postoperatively (p = 0.0002), LVEF < 30% preoperatively (p = 0.0006), no inferior MI preoperatively (p = 0.007) and no internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery graft (p = 0.049). More than a 15% decrease in LVEF at more than 3 years after the operation was seen despite patent bypass grafts in 17.2% of patients who received a late follow-up catheterization, although 41.4% of patients showed an increase or less than 5% decrease in LVEF during this period. CONCLUSION: Combined MV surgery with CABG for IMR should be considered in patients with poor LVEF or without prior inferior MI.
OBJECTIVES: Although ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is one of the most important issues to determine therapeutic strategy for ischemic heart disease, long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for IMR is still unclear. It is also controversial how patients who would benefit from mitral valve (MV) surgery in combination with CABG should be identified. The purpose of this study is to elucidate late outcomes after isolated CABG for moderate IMR and to assess the indication of combined MV surgery. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients who had grade 2 or 3 IMR preoperatively and underwent isolated CABG between 1980 and 2002 in our institute were enrolled. Mitral regurgitation was assessed by 2-dimensional Doppler echocardiography and left ventriculography. Among them, 84 patients (30.1%) had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 30% and 186 patients (66.7%) had prior inferior myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients (46.2%) remained grade 2 or greater MR early postoperatively. Actuarial survival and freedom from cardiac events, analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, were 90.9% and 87.7% at 1 year, 79.2% and 68.8% at 5 years, 54.9% and 49.1% at 10 years and 48.8% and 18.9% at 15 years. Independent predictive risk factors for cardiac events, analyzed by multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model, were grade 2 or greater MR which remained early postoperatively (p = 0.0002), LVEF < 30% preoperatively (p = 0.0006), no inferior MI preoperatively (p = 0.007) and no internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery graft (p = 0.049). More than a 15% decrease in LVEF at more than 3 years after the operation was seen despite patent bypass grafts in 17.2% of patients who received a late follow-up catheterization, although 41.4% of patients showed an increase or less than 5% decrease in LVEF during this period. CONCLUSION: Combined MV surgery with CABG for IMR should be considered in patients with poor LVEF or without prior inferior MI.
Authors: Y Otsuji; M D Handschumacher; E Schwammenthal; L Jiang; J K Song; J L Guerrero; G J Vlahakes; R A Levine Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-09-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: E A Grossi; J D Goldberg; A LaPietra; X Ye; P Zakow; M Sussman; J Delianides; A T Culliford; R A Esposito; G H Ribakove; A C Galloway; S B Colvin Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: M R Llaneras; M L Nance; J T Streicher; P L Linden; S W Downing; J A Lima; R Deac; L H Edmunds Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Anoar Zacharias; Robert H Habib; Thomas A Schwann; Christopher J Riordan; Samuel J Durham; Aamir Shah Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Anthony W Castleberry; Judson B Williams; Mani A Daneshmand; Emily Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; Zainab Samad; Renato D Lopes; John H Alexander; Joseph P Mathew; Eric J Velazquez; Carmelo A Milano; Peter K Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 29.690