Literature DB >> 856394

Medical audit in practice.

R Gruer, A A Gunn, A M Ruxton.   

Abstract

A stage by stage approach was adopted to solve some of the problems of diagnosing and managing acute abdominal pain. Audit started in hopsital and was extended, with the help of a community physician, to cover the practice of a group of general practitioners. Referrals to the accident and emergency department for acute abdominal pain were analysed, and the diagnostic accurancy of general practitioners, accident department staff, and ward staff was assessed. The accuracy of hopsital staff was improved by issuing guidelines and checklists to help in diagnosis. The general practitioners' problems were defined and discussed with the surgeons. The audit continues with the aim of improving the general practitioners' diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 856394      PMCID: PMC1605826          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6066.957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  8 in total

1.  Simplified computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  P D Wilson; J C Horrocks; P J Lyndon; C K Yeung; R E Page; F T De Dombal
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-04-12

2.  The "acute abdomen" in the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  A R Blacklock; A A Gunn
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1976-05

3.  Medical audit. Need for pilot studies in general practice.

Authors:  I Capstick
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-02-16

4.  Medical Audit. Necessary, but rigidity greatest danger.

Authors:  A K Thould
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-02-16

5.  Medical audit. Experience in the U.S.A.

Authors:  P J Sanazaro
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-02-16

6.  The diagnosis of acute abdominal pain with computer analysis.

Authors:  A A Gunn
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1976-05

7.  Medical audit and general practice.

Authors:  H W Acheson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Communication as a method of medical audit.

Authors:  I McColl; L C Fernow; C Mackie; M Rendall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Non-specific abdominal pain: the resource implications.

Authors:  W G Sheridan; A T White; T Havard; D L Crosby
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Aspects of audit. 4: Acceptability of audit.

Authors:  C D Shaw
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-06-14

3.  Making routine data adequate to support clinical audit.

Authors:  M McKee; J Dixon; L Chenet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-12

4.  Overtreatment in surgery: discussion paper.

Authors:  F G Fowkes
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  An audit of prescribing by peer review.

Authors:  P M Reilly; M P Patten
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1978-09

6.  Medical audit in general practice. Butterworth Prize Essay 1981.

Authors:  M G Sheldon
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract Occas Pap       Date:  1982

7.  Aspects of audit. 2. Audit in British hospitals.

Authors:  C D Shaw
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-05-31

8.  General practitioner referral letters--the concept of a fixed-heading format.

Authors:  K Addley; C Duffy
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1982
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.