Literature DB >> 7755730

Treatment of myocardial infarction and angina. Review underestimated the benefit of early thrombolysis.

J Rawles.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1995        PMID： 7755730      PMCID： PMC2548836          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.465a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cardiology--I: Treatment of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and angina pectoris.

Authors:  J McMurray; A Rankin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-19

2.  Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial.

Authors:  W D Weaver; M Cerqueira; A P Hallstrom; P E Litwin; J S Martin; P J Kudenchuk; M Eisenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272
  2 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cost implications of prehospital emergency drug administration. The case of prehospital thrombolytics.

Authors:  S Barton; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Treating heart disease. Estimate of benefit from early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction is wrong.

Authors:  J Rawles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-03

3.  Reduction in treatment delay by paramedic ECG diagnosis of myocardial infarction with direct CCU admission.

Authors:  M W Millar-Craig; A V Joy; M Adamowicz; R Furber; B Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Guidelines for general practitioners administering thrombolytics.

Authors:  J Rawles
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Magnitude of benefit from earlier thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: new evidence from Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT)

Authors:  J Rawles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.