Literature DB >> 8563385

Factors impacting the success of computerized preadmission screening.

J W Hales1, R M Gardner, J T Jacobson.   

Abstract

Many approaches to controlling costs under managed care rely on the ability to prospectively identify the type or level of service a patient requires at the time of presentation. Although computers may effectively predict these factors, the impact of such a computer system is greatly dependent on its integration into the admission process. Three factors that influence the effectiveness of predictive screening using a computer were identified. They are detection, intervention and compliance. The effect of these factors was then measured in a prospective randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of computerized preadmission screening for predicting the appropriateness of inpatient care. This paper examines the three factors and their impact on the effectiveness of the system. A mathematical model that relates the factors to the overall effectiveness of computerized preadmission screening is proposed and considered in a more general context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8563385      PMCID: PMC2579189     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care        ISSN: 0195-4210


  11 in total

1.  Applying brakes to the runaway American health care system. A proposed agenda.

Authors:  N E Davies; L H Felder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Reliability and validity of utilization review criteria. Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, Standardized Medreview Instrument, and Intensity-Severity-Discharge criteria.

Authors:  I Strumwasser; N V Paranjpe; D L Ronis; D Share; L J Sell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  An example of hospital utilization review.

Authors:  L D Wilson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-06

4.  Physician attitudes toward cost containment. The missing piece of the puzzle.

Authors:  H L Greene; R J Goldberg; H Beattie; A R Russo; R C Ellison; J E Dalen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-09

5.  Cost containment and the physician.

Authors:  M Angell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care.

Authors:  P M Gertman; J D Restuccia
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The HELP system.

Authors:  T A Pryor; R M Gardner; P D Clayton; H R Warner
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Preadmission review cuts hospital use.

Authors:  T Shahoda
Journal:  Hospitals       Date:  1984-08-01

9.  Preadmission screening of Medicare patients. The clinical impact of reimbursement disapproval.

Authors:  T F Imperiale; A P Siegal; W B Crede; E A Kamens
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Inappropriate use of hospitals in a randomized trial of health insurance plans.

Authors:  A L Siu; F A Sonnenberg; W G Manning; G A Goldberg; E S Bloomfield; J P Newhouse; R H Brook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies.

Authors:  Francis Lau; Craig Kuziemsky; Morgan Price; Jesse Gardner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for acute care management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Navdeep Sahota; Rob Lloyd; Anita Ramakrishna; Jean A Mackay; Jeanette C Prorok; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.327

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.