Literature DB >> 8562150

Breast tumour response to primary chemotherapy predicts local and distant control as well as survival.

S M Scholl1, J Y Pierga, B Asselain, P Beuzeboc, T Dorval, E Garcia-Giralt, M Jouve, T Palangié, Y Remvikos, J C Durand.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper was to evaluate correlations between clinical response to chemotherapy and outcome in a subgroup analysis of premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery, treated with primary chemotherapy (n = 200) from a previously published trial (Scholl S.M., Fourquet A., Asselain B, et al. Eur J Cancer 1994, 30A, 645-652). Objective response rates amounted to 65% following four courses. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, comparing seven parameters, the following variables were associated with poor survival: clinically involved nodes [N1b:RR: 2.7 (95% CI 1.3-5.3)], the failure to respond to chemotherapy [D:RR: 2.62 (95% CI 1.3-5)] and a raised S phase fraction [SPF > 5%: RR: 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-5)]. Parameters associated with increased metastatic recurrence rates, by order of entry in the model, were: young age [< 35: RR: 2.46 (95% CI 1.2-5)], large clinical tumour size [T3: RR: 2.02 (95% CI 1.2-3.4)], poor histological grade (SBR III: RR: 1.93 (95% CI 1.1-3.3)] and the failure to respond to chemotherapy [D: RR: 1.91 (95% CI 1-3.4)]. The assessment of both tumour cell proliferation rates as well as possibly drug resistance markers (although not available in the present study) should be helpful in selecting patients likely to benefit from intensified chemotherapy regimens. The most accurate predictor of response in the present study appeared to be the response to chemotherapy treatment itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8562150     DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00454-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  26 in total

Review 1.  Gene expression profiling: changing face of breast cancer classification and management.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2011

2.  Long-term outcome after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer and predictive factors for a pathologic complete remission : results of a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  C Matuschek; E Bölke; S L Roth; K Orth; I Lang; H Bojar; J W Janni; W Audretsch; C Nestle-Kraemling; G Lammering; V Speer; S Gripp; P A Gerber; B A Buhren; R Sauer; M Peiper; M Schauer; M Dommach; K Struse-Soll; W Budach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on patients with locally advanced breast cancer in a Nigerian semiurban teaching hospital: a single-center descriptive study.

Authors:  Olukayode Adeolu Arowolo; Andrew Akinbolaji Akinkuolie; Oladejo Olukayode Lawal; Olusegun Isaac Alatise; Abdulkadir Ayo Salako; Adewale Oluseye Adisa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells increase in patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Megan C Duggan; Andrew Stiff; Joseph Markowitz; Prashant Trikha; Kala M Levine; Lynn Schoenfield; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Rachel Layman; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Erin R Macrae; Maryam B Lustberg; Raquel E Reinbolt; Ewa Mrozek; John C Byrd; Michael A Caligiuri; Thomas A Mace; William E Carson
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 6.968

5.  Triple-negative breast cancer: are we making headway at least?

Authors:  Monica Arnedos; Celine Bihan; Suzette Delaloge; Fabrice Andre
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 6.  Management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  The prognostic value of BRCA1 mRNA expression levels following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Mireia Margeli; Beatriz Cirauqui; Eva Castella; Gustavo Tapia; Carlota Costa; Ana Gimenez-Capitan; Agusti Barnadas; Maria Sanchez Ronco; Susana Benlloch; Miquel Taron; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Elevated thymidine kinase 1 in serum following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts poor outcome for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Heng Huang; Xing-Song Tian; Rong Li; Xian-Ming Wang; Wen Wen; Hong Guan; Ya-Jie Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13

10.  Identification of biology-based breast cancer types with distinct predictive and prognostic features: role of steroid hormone and HER2 receptor expression in patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Sibylle Loibl; Berit M Müller; Marc Roller; Carsten Denkert; Martina Komor; Karsten Schlüns; Jens Uwe Blohmer; Jan Budczies; Bernd Gerber; Aurelia Noske; Andreas du Bois; Wilko Weichert; Christian Jackisch; Manfred Dietel; Klaus Richter; Manfred Kaufmann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.