Literature DB >> 8561611

Mechanical bridge to transplantation: when is too early? When is too late?

D Y Loisance1, F Pouillart, C Benvenuti, P H Deleuze, J P Mazzucotelli, P Le Besnerais, A Mourtada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal timing of implantation of a mechanical circulatory support system in the treatment of acute cardiogenic shock is still unsettled. The issue has been addressed in a retrospective analysis of a group of 98 patients in cardiogenic shock refractory to medical therapy who were candidates for cardiac transplantation, admitted from 1987 to 1994.
METHODS: The treatment included reinforced inotropic support by addition of phosphodiesterase inhibitors to sympathomimetic agents. The patients who did not improve were immediately brought to the operating room for mechanical circulatory support system implantation.
RESULTS: The overall survival in the group of 28 patients selected for mechanical bridge is 50%. No predictive factors of death or multiorgan failure while on the device could be identified, suggesting a lack of contraindications to mechanical circulatory support system implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: The high death rate in patients maintained on medical therapy because of initial improvement as they are awaiting transplantation suggests the benefit of a rapid semielective implantation of an intracorporeal device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8561611     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01024-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Integrated management of cardiac failure: the cardiac failure clinic.

Authors:  Daniel Loisance
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Thoratec paracorporeal biventricular assist device therapy: the Freiburg experience.

Authors:  Kerstin Brehm; Claudia Heilmann; Matthias Siepe; Christoph Benk; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Christian Schlensak
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 4.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2008-09

5.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices: new deus ex machina?

Authors:  Diego Arroyo; Stéphane Cook
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2011-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.