Literature DB >> 8561345

Oscillometric blood pressure measurements by different devices are not interchangeable.

M A Kaufmann1, H Pargger, L J Drop.   

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is frequently measured in patients by noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitors. Values obtained by oscillometric devices of different brands may appear in one patient's record as if they were interchangeable; their concordance, however, has not been established. In 25 patients with major depression who were treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) BP was measured on either arm by devices manufactured by SpaceLabs (SpL, 12 patients, 182 data points) and Marquette (Marq, 13 patients, 193 data points), respectively, and comparisons were made with simultaneous measurements on the opposite arm by Dinamap 1846SX (DIN), during the awake state and at 1-min intervals up to 5-7 min after ECT. Because ECT is associated with an intense, but short-lasting hyperdynamic state, comparisons of BP values could be made over a wide range of pressures. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to show the distribution of pressure differences at all pressures. Agreements between two instruments were judged according to guide lines by the American Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). The standard deviation of the difference (SDD) between two DIN devices was 7 mm Hg for systolic (SBP) and 6.3 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), whereas mean differences were 0.9 and 0.2 mm Hg, respectively (P = not significant [NS]), thus showing reproducibility. Corresponding SDD values SpL versus DIN were 9.1 for SBP and 8.3 mm Hg for DBP, while the mean differences were 1.6 (P = 0.026) and 7.3 (P = 0.0001) mm Hg, respectively. Corresponding SDD values for Marq versus DIN were 11.8 and 9.7 mm Hg with mean differences of 0.8 (P = NS) and 0.3 (P = NS) mm Hg. Whereas SBP differences DIN versus DIN exceeded 10 mm Hg in only 10% of observations, they exceeded that threshold in 31% and 32% of observations for SpL versus DIN and Marq versus DIN, respectively. In view of the variability that exceeds the AAMI guidelines and the one out of three occurrence of individual SBP differences exceeding 10 mm Hg for comparisons of SpL or Marq versus DIN, measurements by these three oscillometric devices are not interchangeable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8561345     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199602000-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

Review 1.  Are pitfalls of oxcillometric blood pressure measurements preventable in children?

Authors:  Lavjay Butani; Bruce Z Morgenstern
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Implementation of a standards-based anaesthesia record compliant with the health level 7 (HL7) clinical document architecture (CDA).

Authors:  M J Hurrell; T G Monk; A Nicol; A N Norton; D L Reich; J L Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Ten concerns about blood pressure measurement and targets in paediatric sepsis.

Authors:  Matko Marlais; Mark D Lyttle; David Inwald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  How are hypertensive children evaluated and managed? A survey of North American pediatric nephrologists.

Authors:  Robert P Woroniecki; Joseph T Flynn
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Treatment of primary and secondary hypertension in children.

Authors:  Douglas M Silverstein; Edward Champoux; Diego H Aviles; V Matti Vehaskari
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Reference Values for Noninvasive Blood Pressure in Children during Anesthesia: A Multicentered Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jurgen C de Graaff; Wietze Pasma; Stef van Buuren; Jesse J Duijghuisen; Olubukola O Nafiu; Sachin Kheterpal; Wilton A van Klei
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Handcrafted cuff manometers do not accurately measure endotracheal tube cuff pressure.

Authors:  Raquel Annoni; Antonio Evanir de Almeida Junior
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 8.  Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Keisyanne Araujo-Moura; Letícia Gabrielle Souza; Gabriele Luz Mello; Augusto César Ferreira De Moraes
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 9.  Evaluation and management of pediatric hypertensive crises: hypertensive urgency and hypertensive emergencies.

Authors:  Nirali H Patel; Sarah K Romero; David C Kaelber
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.