Literature DB >> 8556084

Analgesic administration, pain intensity, and patient satisfaction in cardiac surgical patients.

D A Meehan1, M E McRae, D A Rourke, C Eisenring, F A Imperial.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain can adversely affect a patient's physiological and psychological recovery, yet little is known about the pain experience of cardiac surgical patients.
OBJECTIVES: To examine nursing practice regarding analgesic administration and measure pain intensity and patient satisfaction with pain management practices.
METHODS: To establish baseline nursing practice regarding analgesic administration, charts were reviewed retrospectively in 50 adult cardiac surgical patients, and the same information was collected concurrently for a prospective sample of 51 patients. The subjects completed visual analogue scales as a measure of pain intensity twice daily while in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit and Pain Relief Satisfaction Questionnaires on the day after transfer from the unit.
RESULTS: Patients in the prospective group received significantly more analgesia. Pain intensity was moderate (4 or greater on the Visual Analogue Scale). Women had higher overall visual analogue scale scores than did men, 4.57 versus 3.70. Patients in whom an internal mammary artery had been used as a bypass graft had significantly higher scores compared with patients with vein grafts. The Pain Relief Satisfaction Questionnaire responses indicated that 96% of the patients experienced effective pain management in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite receiving analgesic doses twice those reported elsewhere for similar populations, the patients in this study reported moderate pain intensity. This finding was confounded by the fact that 96% expressed satisfaction with their pain management in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit. Frequent assessment and documentation of both pain and pain relief from interventions are necessary if the healthcare team is to implement an individualized analgesic regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8556084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  9 in total

1.  Improving assessment of postoperative pain in surgical wards by education and training.

Authors:  R Karlsten; K Ström; L Gunningberg
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

2.  [Interdisciplinary position paper "Perioperative pain management"].

Authors:  R Likar; W Jaksch; T Aigmüller; M Brunner; T Cohnert; J Dieber; W Eisner; S Geyrhofer; G Grögl; F Herbst; R Hetterle; F Javorsky; H G Kress; O Kwasny; S Madersbacher; H Mächler; R Mittermair; J Osterbrink; B Stöckl; M Sulzbacher; B Taxer; B Todoroff; A Tuchmann; A Wicker; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Intrathecal morphine in two patients undergoing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during aortic surgery -A case report-.

Authors:  Rene Przkora; Tomas D Martin; Philip J Hess; Rama S Kulkarni
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-12-14

Review 4.  A Review of Current Analgesic Techniques in Cardiac Surgery. Is Epidural Worth it?

Authors:  Mohsen Ziyaeifard; Rasoul Azarfarin; Samad Ej Golzari
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 5.  Assessment and pathophysiology of pain in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Marek Zubrzycki; Andreas Liebold; Christian Skrabal; Helmut Reinelt; Mechthild Ziegler; Ewelina Perdas; Maria Zubrzycka
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 6.  Analgesia and sedation post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mansour Jannati; Armin Attar
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Pain location and intensity during the first week following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Ziae Totonchi; Somayeh Seifi; Mitra Chitsazan; Alireza Alizadeh Ghavidel; Farah Baazm; Seyedeh Zahra Faritus
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2013-12-26

8.  Computerized physician order entry of a sedation protocol is not associated with improved sedation practice or outcomes in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Samir H Haddad; Catherine B Gonzales; Ahmad M Deeb; Hani M Tamim; Abdulaziz S AlDawood; Ibrahim Al Babtain; Brintha S Naidu; Yaseen M Arabi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 9.  The Impact of Pain Assessment on Critically Ill Patients' Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evanthia Georgiou; Maria Hadjibalassi; Ekaterini Lambrinou; Panayiota Andreou; Elizabeth D E Papathanassoglou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.