Literature DB >> 8554473

Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: relation between somatosensory evoked potentials, neurological deficit, and hand function.

A Curt1, V Dietz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Median and ulnar somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) in the assessment of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) in relation to the outcome of hand function.
DESIGN: Cohort analytical study.
SETTING: Spinal cord injury center, university hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutively sampled, 23 acute and 46 chronic tetraplegics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Median and ulnar SEP recordings graded in 5 categories, from normal to absent; (2) clinical examination of algesia/aesthesia in dermatomes C5/6 and C8/Th1 graded in categories of normal, impaired, and loss of sensation; (3) clinical examination of hand function graded in 4 categories, from active to inactive hand function.
RESULTS: Pathological median and ulnar SEP were found in 46% and 76% of patients, respectively. A differentiation between upper (C3-C6) and lower (C6/C7-Th1) cervical SCI was possible by comparing the SEP N20 latencies (but not amplitudes) of both nerves (Mann-Whitney U test, p < .01). In follow-up examinations over 6 months the N20 amplitude increased significantly (ANCOVA, p < .001), while the N20 latency did not change. By both ulnar SEP recordings and assessment of the sensory deficit in dermatome C8/Th1 the outcome of hand function, i.e., the development of active or inactive hand function, could be predicted (Mann-Whitney U test, p < .01).
CONCLUSION: Median and ulnar SEP are valuable to indicate the level of injury, the degree of sensory impairment and to predict the outcome of hand function even in unconscious patients. They can improve the diagnostic assessment of cervical SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8554473     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90219-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  16 in total

1.  Influence of Spinal Cord Integrity on Gait Control in Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Lea Awai; Marc Bolliger; Adam R Ferguson; Grégoire Courtine; Armin Curt
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Loss and spontaneous recovery of forelimb evoked potentials in both the adult rat cuneate nucleus and somatosensory cortex following contusive cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Stephen M Onifer; Christine D Nunn; Julie A Decker; Beth N Payne; Michelle R Wagoner; Aaron H Puckett; James M Massey; James Armstrong; Ezidin G Kaddumi; Kimberly G Fentress; Michael J Wells; Robert M West; Charles C Calloway; Jeffrey T Schnell; Christopher M Whitaker; Darlene A Burke; Charles H Hubscher
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  [Neurological and functional recovery from spinal cord injury. Progress and evaluation standards in paraplegic medicine].

Authors:  A Curt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  G. Heiner Sell memorial lecture: neuronal plasticity after spinal cord injury: significance for present and future treatments.

Authors:  Volker Dietz
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Afferent input and sensory function after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Recep A Ozdemir; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Application of electrophysiological measures in spinal cord injury clinical trials: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michèle Hubli; John L K Kramer; Catherine R Jutzeler; Jan Rosner; Julio C Furlan; Keith E Tansey; Martin Schubert
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  The natural course of passive tenodesis grip in individuals with spinal cord injury with preserved wrist extension power but paralyzed fingers and thumbs.

Authors:  Hae Yoon Jung; Jieun Lee; Hyung Ik Shin
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 8.  A synthesis of best evidence for the restoration of upper-extremity function in people with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Mary C Verrier
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 1.037

9.  Prognosis and recovery in ischaemic and traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical and electrophysiological evaluation.

Authors:  E Iseli; A Cavigelli; V Dietz; A Curt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 10.  Spinal cord injury: how can we improve the classification and quantification of its severity and prognosis?

Authors:  Vibhor Krishna; Hampton Andrews; Abhay Varma; Jacobo Mintzer; Mark S Kindy; James Guest
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.