Literature DB >> 8553397

Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients.

N B Lincoln1, D Willis, S A Philips, L C Juby, P Berman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to observe patients on a stroke unit and to compare their activity with that of patients on conventional hospital wards to identify aspects of rehabilitation practice that might account for differences in outcome.
METHODS: Stroke patients admitted to the hospital were observed on three 8-hour shifts over 3 consecutive days. An observer recorded, at 10-minute intervals, where patients were, what they were doing, and whether their positioning was as recommended by rehabilitation therapists. Patients on a stroke unit were compared with those on conventional wards.
RESULTS: Stroke unit patients spent less time by their beds and more time in other locations on the ward (P < .001). There were significant differences in the frequency of behaviors observed in the two types of ward (P < .001). Stroke unit patients had significantly more interaction with nurses and therapists (P < .001). They were also more often in the recommended position (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of time in therapeutic activity was low in all locations, with patients spending many hours sitting and doing nothing. Despite this, stroke unit patients had more therapeutic contact with staff and were more often in the recommended position. These two features may account for some of the differences in outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8553397     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.27.1.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  11 in total

1.  Environmental factors in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  L W Holmqvist; L von Koch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-23

2.  Short-Duration and Intensive Training Improves Long-Term Reaching Performance in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Hyeshin Park; Sujin Kim; Carolee J Winstein; James Gordon; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke.

Authors:  Ruth E Barclay-Goddard; Ted J Stevenson; William Poluha; Leyda Thalman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

4.  Factors Facilitating and Hindering the Use of Newly Acquired Positioning Skills in Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Survey.

Authors:  Vera U Ludwig; Heidrun Pickenbrock; Daniel A Döppner
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  Clinical Predictors of Engagement in Inpatient Rehabilitation Among Stroke Survivors With Cognitive Deficits: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Emily A Kringle; Lauren Terhorst; Meryl A Butters; Elizabeth R Skidmore
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients.

Authors:  Tanya West; Julie Bernhardt
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2011-09-28

7.  Feasibility of the adaptive and automatic presentation of tasks (ADAPT) system for rehabilitation of upper extremity function post-stroke.

Authors:  Younggeun Choi; James Gordon; Hyeshin Park; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Early Steps in Automated Behavior Mapping via Indoor Sensors.

Authors:  Taner Arsan; Orcun Kepez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Cardiovascular responses associated with daily walking in subacute stroke.

Authors:  Sanjay K Prajapati; Avril Mansfield; William H Gage; Dina Brooks; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2013-02-14

10.  Ambulatory monitoring of activity levels of individuals in the sub-acute stage following stroke: a case series.

Authors:  William H Gage; Karl F Zabjek; Kathryn M Sibley; Ada Tang; Dina Brooks; William E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.