Literature DB >> 8551991

Calculation of x-ray spectra for radiosurgical beams.

K E Sixel1, B A Faddegon.   

Abstract

As conformal radiosurgery using micromultileaf collimators gains feasibility, dose calculation algorithms based on Monte Carlo or convolution techniques may become necessary. These require radiosurgical x-ray spectra. The most accurate method currently available to estimate clinical radiosurgery spectra is the Monte Carlo method. In this study the EGS4 Monte Carlo system was used to simulate the thick target of a 6 MV linear accelerator used for radiosurgery in our center. The calculated spectrum was attenuated through any significant mass thickness of material downstream from the target. The attenuated thick-target spectral distributions calculated both with and without the flattening filter were compared to the attenuated, thin target spectrum based on the small angle Schiff analytical spectrum calculated for the same target and attenuator material, as well as with a published spectrum from a full Monte Carlo simulation of a treatment head with a flattener in place. The Schiff spectrum neglects contributions from lower-energy scattered electrons that significantly degrade the quality of the beam. The flattener is removed from our accelerator during radiosurgery to increase the dose rate to approximately 750 cGy/min for a 10 x 10 cm2 field at the depth of dose maximum. This leaves a substantial fluence of photons below 1 MeV that are not observed in published spectra calculated for accelerators with flattening filters. Removal of the flattening filter has a measurable effect on the central axis depth dose, reducing the percentage dose at 10 cm depth from 59.2% to 54.3% for a 10 mm diam field. Radiosurgical off-axis ratios and percentage depth dose distributions calculated from these spectra with the EGS4 Monte Carlo code were compared to measured data. Measured and calculated dose distributions both with and without flattener were in good agreement. The dose distributions were found to be insensitive to the differences in the various calculated spectral distributions. Thus, although the attenuated Schiff spectrum is significantly harder than the clinical beam, it is adequate for dose calculations of radiosurgical beams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8551991     DOI: 10.1118/1.597426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  A surface energy spectral study on the bone heterogeneity and beam obliquity using the flattened and unflattened photon beams.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Amir M Owrangi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-11-30

2.  Energy spectrum and dose enhancement due to the depth of the Lipiodol position using flattened and unflattened beams.

Authors:  Daisuke Kawahara; Shuichi Ozawa; Akito Saito; Tomoki Kimura; Tatsuhiko Suzuki; Masato Tsuneda; Sodai Tanaka; Kazunari Hioki; Takeo Nakashima; Yoshimi Ohno; Yuji Murakami; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-01-12

3.  Fidelity of dose delivery at high dose rate of volumetric modulated arc therapy in a truebeam linac with flattening filter free beams.

Authors:  Georgios Kalantzis; Jianguo Qian; Bin Han; Gary Luxton
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-10

4.  Dosimetric properties of a beam quality-matched 6 MV unflattened photon beam.

Authors:  Yunfei Huang; R Alfredo Siochi; John E Bayouth
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans for the treatment of glioma using flattening filter-free and flattening filter modes.

Authors:  Dandan Xu; Fei Jia; Guowen Li; Hongfei Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Flattening filter-free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group.

Authors:  Ying Xiao; Stephen F Kry; Richard Popple; Ellen Yorke; Niko Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis; Ping Xia; Saiful Huq; John Bayouth; James Galvin; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  A dosimetric evaluation of flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Guishan Fu; Minghui Li; Yixin Song; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-07

8.  Characterization of cylindrical ionization chambers for patient specific IMRT QA.

Authors:  Danielle Fraser; William Parker; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Effect of secondary electron generation on dose enhancement in Lipiodol with and without a flattening filter.

Authors:  Daisuke Kawahara; Shuichi Ozawa; Akito Saito; Tomoki Kimura; Tatsuhiko Suzuki; Masato Tsuneda; Sodai Tanaka; Takeo Nakashima; Yoshimi Ohno; Yuji Murakami; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.