Literature DB >> 8550643

A comparison of intersegmental joint dynamics to isokinetic dynamometer measurements.

K R Kaufman1, K N An, E Y Chao.   

Abstract

This study quantified the errors associated with measurements obtained using an isokinetic dynamometer for knee evaluation at 60 degrees and 180 degrees s-1. Five normal subjects were tested. A triaxial electrogoniometer was used to measure the kinematics. A custom-designed load cell was used to measure the three orthogonal components of the reaction force applied by the isokinetic dynamometer to the leg. The inverse dynamics problem was solved to obtain the intersegmental dynamics at the knee joint. These data were compared to those obtained from the isokinetic dynamometer. The results indicate that the knee motion recorded by the isokinetic dynamometer was in error by 7-9 degrees during flexion and 10-13 degrees during extension. The isokinetic dynamometer recorded knee flexions which were less than actual during the flexion portion of the exercise and greater than actual during extension. The duration of constant velocity was limited based on the speed selected. The knee moment was in error by 5 Nm during flexion and 25-29 Nm during extension. The use of a gravity correction factor reduced the knee moment error during extension, but increased it during flexion.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8550643     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00176-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

1.  Mechanical correction of dynamometer moment for the effects of segment motion during isometric knee-extension tests.

Authors:  Dimitrios E Tsaopoulos; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; Paula J Richards; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-04-07

2.  Selective contribution of each hamstring muscle to anterior cruciate ligament protection and tibiofemoral joint stability in leg-extension exercise: a simulation study.

Authors:  Andrea Biscarini; Fabio Massimo Botti; Vito Enrico Pettorossi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Strain and elongation of the vastus lateralis aponeurosis and tendon in vivo during maximal isometric contraction.

Authors:  Savvas Stafilidis; Kiros Karamanidis; Gaspar Morey-Klapsing; Gianpiero Demonte; Gert-Peter Brüggemann; Adamantios Arampatzis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Selective muscle contraction during plantarflexion is incompatible with maximal voluntary torque assessment.

Authors:  Nicolas A Turpin; Antony Costes; David Villeger; Bruno Watier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Glenohumeral rotational motion and strength and baseball pitching biomechanics.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Relationship between the medial elbow adduction moment during pitching and ulnar collateral ligament appearance during magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Kenton R Kaufman; Naveen S Murthy
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Shoulder demands in manual wheelchair users across a spectrum of activities.

Authors:  Melissa M B Morrow; Wendy J Hurd; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Pitch velocity is a predictor of medial elbow distraction forces in the uninjured high school-aged baseball pitcher.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Reza Jazayeri; Karen Mohr; Orr Limpisvasti; Neal S Elattrache; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Isokinetic training effect of ankle positions on knee extensor strength.

Authors:  Yong-Jun Cha
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-09-17

10.  Isokinetic Identification of Knee Joint Torques before and after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Adam Czaplicki; Marta Jarocka; Jacek Walawski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.