Literature DB >> 21474701

Mechanical correction of dynamometer moment for the effects of segment motion during isometric knee-extension tests.

Dimitrios E Tsaopoulos1, Vasilios Baltzopoulos, Paula J Richards, Constantinos N Maganaris.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of dynamometer and joint axis misalignment on measured isometric knee-extension moments using inverse dynamics based on the actual joint kinematic information derived from the real-time X-ray video and to compare the errors when the moments were calculated using measurements from external anatomical surface markers or obtained from the isokinetic dynamometer. Six healthy males participated in this study. They performed isometric contractions at 90° and 20° of knee flexion, gradually increasing to maximum effort. For the calculation of the actual knee-joint moment and the joint moment relative to the knee-joint center, determined using the external marker, two free body diagrams were used of the Cybex arm and the lower leg segment system. In the first free body diagram, the mean center of the circular profiles of the femoral epicondyles was used as the knee-joint center, whereas in the second diagram, the joint center was assumed to coincide with the external marker. Then, the calculated knee-joint moments were compared with those measured by the dynamometer. The results indicate that 1) the actual knee-joint moment was different from the dynamometer recorded moment (difference ranged between 1.9% and 4.3%) and the moment calculated using the skin marker (difference ranged between 2.5% and 3%), and 2) during isometric knee extension, the internal knee angle changed significantly from rest to the maximum contraction state by about 19°. Therefore, these differences cannot be neglected if the moment-knee-joint angle relationship or the muscle mechanical properties, such as length-tension relationship, need to be determined.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21474701      PMCID: PMC3137545          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00821.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  22 in total

1.  Tibiofemoral joint forces during maximal isokinetic eccentric and concentric efforts of the knee flexors.

Authors:  E Kellis
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Three-dimensional morphology of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality.

Authors:  D G Eckhoff; T F Dwyer; J M Bach; V M Spitzer; K D Reinig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Muscular and tibiofemoral joint forces during isokinetic concentric knee extension.

Authors:  V Baltzopoulos
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  In-vivo sagittal plane knee kinematics: ACL intact, deficient and reconstructed knees.

Authors:  D L Isaac; D J Beard; A J Price; J Rees; D W Murray; C A F Dodd
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Inevitable joint angular rotation affects muscle architecture during isometric contraction.

Authors:  Kiros Karamanidis; Savvas Stafilidis; Gianpiero DeMonte; Gaspar Morey-Klapsing; Gert-Peter Brüggemann; Adamantios Arampatzis
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  The relation between the resultant moments at a joint and the moments measured by an isokinetic dynamometer.

Authors:  W Herzog
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The axes of rotation of the knee.

Authors:  A M Hollister; S Jatana; A K Singh; W W Sullivan; A G Lupichuk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Errors in the use of isokinetic dynamometers.

Authors:  D A Winter; R P Wells; G W Orr
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1981

9.  Load-displacement properties of the human triceps surae aponeurosis in vivo.

Authors:  S P Magnusson; P Aagaard; P Dyhre-Poulsen; M Kjaer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Differences between measured and resultant joint moments during voluntary and artificially elicited isometric knee extension contractions.

Authors:  Adamantios Arampatzis; Kiros Karamanidis; Gianpiero De Monte; Savvas Stafilidis; Gaspar Morey-Klapsing; Gert-Peter Brüggemann
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  4 in total

1.  Immediate effects of whole body vibration on patellar tendon properties and knee extension torque.

Authors:  F Rieder; H-P Wiesinger; A Kösters; E Müller; O R Seynnes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Does knee joint cooling change in vivo patellar tendon mechanical properties?

Authors:  Luis M Alegre; Michael Hasler; Sebastian Wenger; Werner Nachbauer; Robert Csapo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Robot-assisted assessment of muscle strength.

Authors:  Marco Toigo; Martin Flück; Robert Riener; Verena Klamroth-Marganska
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Morphological and Mechanical Properties of the Human Patella Tendon in Adult Males With Achondroplasia.

Authors:  David T Sims; Gladys L Onambélé-Pearson; Adrian Burden; Carl Payton; Christopher I Morse
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.