Literature DB >> 8549870

Report of the American Diabetes Association's Task Force on standardization of the insulin assay.

D C Robbins1, L Andersen, R Bowsher, R Chance, B Dinesen, B Frank, R Gingerich, D Goldstein, H M Widemeyer, S Haffner, C N Hales, L Jarett, K Polonsky, D Porte, J Skyler, G Webb, K Gallagher.   

Abstract

Recent large-scale epidemiological studies demonstrate that blood concentrations of immunoreactive insulin predict the development of NIDDM and IDDM and are associated with the risk of several degenerative diseases, such as coronary and peripheral vessel atherosclerosis, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The reliability of these measurements is dependent on a biological assay that has not been well standardized between laboratories. Recognizing this, the American Diabetes Association organized a task force to assess comparability of blood insulin measurements between laboratories and to suggest techniques to improve comparability. The task force found that identical serum and plasma samples measured in different laboratories produced widely disparate values that were unacceptable for population comparisons. Use of a single reference standard did little to improve comparability. Assay characteristics such as linearity, recovery, accuracy, and cross-reactivity to proinsulin and its primary conversion intermediates varied among the laboratories, and they did not readily explain differences in the measurements made from assay to assay. Use of the same assay kit in different laboratories did not always ensure comparable measurements. Linear regression of assay results from one laboratory to an arbitrarily chosen reference assay greatly improved comparability and demonstrated the potential value in comparing each assay to a reference method. The task force report defines acceptable assay characteristics and proposes a three-step process of insulin assay proficiency and comparability. A central reference assay and ongoing sample exchange will be needed to allow reliable comparisons of insulin measurements made in different laboratories. Rigorous quality control and continuous quality improvement are needed to maintain reliability of the insulin measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8549870     DOI: 10.2337/diab.45.2.242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  36 in total

1.  Disorders of glucose metabolism: post mortem analyses in forensic cases--part II.

Authors:  Frank Musshoff; Cornelius Hess; Burkhard Madea
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Predicting impaired glucose metabolism in women with polycystic ovary syndrome by decision tree modelling.

Authors:  M Möhlig; A Flöter; J Spranger; M O Weickert; T Schill; H W Schlösser; G Brabant; A F H Pfeiffer; J Selbig; C Schöfl
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 3.  Estimation of insulin sensitivity in children: methods, measures and controversies.

Authors:  Rebecca J Brown; Jack A Yanovski
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.866

4.  A risk score for identifying overweight adolescents with dysglycemia in primary care settings.

Authors:  Joyce M Lee; Achamyeleh Gebremariam; Susan J Woolford; Beth A Tarini; Melissa A Valerio; Surair Bashir; Ashley J Eason; Preciosa Y Choi; James G Gurney
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.634

Review 5.  The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

Authors:  R Kahn; J Buse; E Ferrannini; M Stern
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Plasma insulin and cardiovascular mortality in non-diabetic European men and women: a meta-analysis of data from eleven prospective studies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Characteristics of type 2 diabetes in terms of insulin resistance in Korea.

Authors:  Jong-Suk Park; Chul-Sik Kim; Joo-Young Nam; Dol-Mi Kim; Min-Ho Jo; Jina Park; Chul-Woo Ahn; Bong-Soo Cha; Sung-Kil Lim; Kyung-Rae Kim; Hyun-Chul Lee; Kap-Bum Huh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Cutoff values of surrogate measures of insulin resistance for metabolic syndrome in Korean non-diabetic adults.

Authors:  Sihoon Lee; Sunghee Choi; Hae Jin Kim; Yoon-Sok Chung; Kwan Woo Lee; Hyun Chul Lee; Kap Bum Huh; Dae Jung Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Beta cell function and its relation to insulin action in humans: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  E Ferrannini; A Mari
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Insulin assay standardization: leading to measures of insulin sensitivity and secretion for practical clinical care.

Authors:  Myrlene A Staten; Michael P Stern; W Greg Miller; Michael W Steffes; Scott E Campbell
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.