AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a risk factor of type 2 diabetes. Screening for impaired glucose metabolism (IGM) with an OGTT has been recommended, but this is relatively time-consuming and inconvenient. Thus, a strategy that could minimise the need for an OGTT would be beneficial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive PCOS patients (n=118) with fasting glucose <6.1 mmol/l were included in the study. Parameters derived from medical history, clinical examination and fasting blood samples were assessed by decision tree modelling for their ability to discriminate women with IGM (2-h OGTT value >/=7.8 mmol/l) from those with NGT. RESULTS: According to the OGTT results, 93 PCOS women had NGT and 25 had IGM. The best decision tree consisted of HOMA-IR, the proinsulin:insulin ratio, proinsulin, 17-OH progesterone and the ratio of luteinising hormone:follicle-stimulating hormone. This tree identified 69 women with NGT. The remaining 49 women included all women with IGM (100% sensitivity, 74% specificity to detect IGM). Pruning this tree to three levels still identified 53 women with NGT (100% sensitivity, 57% specificity to detect IGM). Restricting the data matrix used for tree modelling to medical history and clinical parameters produced a tree using BMI, waist circumference and WHR. Pruning this tree to two levels separated 27 women with NGT (100% sensitivity, 29% specificity to detect IGM). The validity of both trees was tested by a leave-10%-out cross-validation. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Decision trees are useful tools for separating PCOS women with NGT from those with IGM. They can be used for stratifying the metabolic screening of PCOS women, whereby the number of OGTTs can be markedly reduced.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a risk factor of type 2 diabetes. Screening for impaired glucose metabolism (IGM) with an OGTT has been recommended, but this is relatively time-consuming and inconvenient. Thus, a strategy that could minimise the need for an OGTT would be beneficial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive PCOS patients (n=118) with fasting glucose <6.1 mmol/l were included in the study. Parameters derived from medical history, clinical examination and fasting blood samples were assessed by decision tree modelling for their ability to discriminate women with IGM (2-h OGTT value >/=7.8 mmol/l) from those with NGT. RESULTS: According to the OGTT results, 93 PCOS women had NGT and 25 had IGM. The best decision tree consisted of HOMA-IR, the proinsulin:insulin ratio, proinsulin, 17-OH progesterone and the ratio of luteinising hormone:follicle-stimulating hormone. This tree identified 69 women with NGT. The remaining 49 women included all women with IGM (100% sensitivity, 74% specificity to detect IGM). Pruning this tree to three levels still identified 53 women with NGT (100% sensitivity, 57% specificity to detect IGM). Restricting the data matrix used for tree modelling to medical history and clinical parameters produced a tree using BMI, waist circumference and WHR. Pruning this tree to two levels separated 27 women with NGT (100% sensitivity, 29% specificity to detect IGM). The validity of both trees was tested by a leave-10%-out cross-validation. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Decision trees are useful tools for separating PCOS women with NGT from those with IGM. They can be used for stratifying the metabolic screening of PCOS women, whereby the number of OGTTs can be markedly reduced.
Authors: Mark R Palmert; Catherine M Gordon; Alex I Kartashov; Richard S Legro; S Jean Emans; Andrea Dunaif Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Mark Garzotto; Tomasz M Beer; R Guy Hudson; Laura Peters; Yi-Ching Hsieh; Eduardo Barrera; Thomas Klein; Motomi Mori Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joachim Spranger; Matthias Möhlig; Uta Wegewitz; Michael Ristow; Andreas F H Pfeiffer; Thilo Schill; Hans W Schlösser; Georg Brabant; Christof Schöfl Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Matthias Möhlig; Joachim Spranger; Martin Osterhoff; Michael Ristow; Andreas F H Pfeiffer; Thilo Schill; Hans W Schlösser; Georg Brabant; Christof Schöfl Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: H F Escobar-Morreale; G Villuendas; J I Botella-Carretero; J Sancho; J L San Millán Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2003-05-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Martin O Weickert; Beate Schöfl-Siegert; Ayman M Arafat; Andreas F H Pfeiffer; Matthias Möhlig; Christof Schöfl Journal: Endocrine Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 3.633