Literature DB >> 8544268

The definition and preoperative prediction of clinically insignificant prostate cancer.

J A Dugan1, D G Bostwick, R P Myers, J Qian, E J Bergstralh, J E Oesterling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define clinically insignificant prostate cancer according to cancer volume, grade, cancer doubling time, and life expectancy; and to determine how many insignificant cancers are removed by radical prostatectomy. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Clinically insignificant cancer was defined as a tumor that would give rise to no more than 20 cm3 of cancer within the prostate by the time of expected patient death (1990 life tables) and whose Gleason score was less than 4 in 40- to 49-year-olds, 5 in 50- to 59-year-olds, 6 in 60- to 69-year-olds, and 7 in 70- to 79-year-olds. Four definitions were formulated based on assumed cancer volume doubling times of 2, 3, 4, and 6 years. Using these four definitions, we reviewed 337 totally embedded prostates removed at Mayo Clinic between 1991 and 1993 for clinical stage T1c through T3 cancer to determine how many contained clinically insignificant cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinically significant vs clinically insignificant prostate cancer.
RESULTS: For cancer volume doubling time of 2, 3, 4, and 6 years, clinically insignificant cancer was identified in one (0.3%), 13 (3.9%), 25 (7.4%), and 49 (14.5%) of 337 prostatectomy specimens, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinically insignificant prostate cancer can be defined by cancer volume, grade, cancer volume doubling time, and life expectancy of the patient. According to our definitions, most men treated with radical prostatectomy have clinically significant cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8544268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

1.  Utility of volume adjusted prostate specific antigen density in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in Arab men.

Authors:  M Sheikh; O Al-Saeed; E O Kehinde; T Sinan; J T Anim; Y Ali
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Assessment of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1 false-positive category 4 and 5 lesions in clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xiangyu Wang; Weizong Liu; Yi Lei; Guangyao Wu; Fan Lin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-12

3.  Shift of tumor features in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy since the beginning of the PSA era.

Authors:  Herbert Augustin; Marco Auprich; Philipp Stummvoll; Katja Lipsky; Karl Pummer; Peter Petritsch
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Expectant management as an option for men with stage T1c prostate cancer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J L Mohler; B T Williams; J A Freeman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Targeted focal therapy for prostate cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kathryn F Sullivan; E David Crawford
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-08

6.  Pathological characteristics of low risk prostate cancer based on totally embedded prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Jonathan I Epstein; Chul S Ha; Oleksandr N Kryvenko
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Rishi Nayyar; Prabhjot Singh; Narmada P Gupta; Ashok K Hemal; Prem N Dogra; Amlesh Seth; Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theo H Van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of extended biopsies for the staging of microfocal prostate cancers in autopsy specimen.

Authors:  N B Delongchamps; G de la Roza; V Chandan; R Jones; G Threatte; M Jumbelic; G P Haas
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Can high-spatial resolution T2-weighted endorectal MRI rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?

Authors:  Matthias C Roethke; Michaela Kniess; Sascha Kaufmann; Matthias P Lichy; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Arnulf Stenzl; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.