Literature DB >> 8543970

Results of a randomized trial comparing intra-arterial cisplatin and intravenous PCNU for the treatment of primary brain tumors in adults: Brain Tumor Cooperative Group trial 8420A.

E M Hiesiger1, S B Green, W R Shapiro, P C Burger, R G Selker, M S Mahaley, J Ransohoff, J C VanGilder, J Mealey, J T Robertson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin versus intravenous (IV) PCNU for treating primary brain tumors, in a randomized trial (Brain Tumor Cooperative Group [BTCG] Trial 8420A).
METHODS: 311 adult patients (ages 19-79 years; median 45) with supratentorial tumors (confirmed histologically) were randomized by nine participating institutions. Patients were required to have completed radiotherapy (4500-6020 cGy to the tumor bed) before randomization. Patients were stratified as either nonprogressive (clinically and radiologically stable) or progressive. Results were analyzed for the 311 patients in the randomized population (RP), and for the 281 patients in the Valid Study Group (VSG) meeting protocol eligibility requirements. 56% of patients in the VSG had glioblastoma multiforme, 33% had other malignant glioma, and 11% had low-grade glioma. 64% were stratified as progressive. 12% had received prior chemotherapy.
RESULTS: The group randomized to PCNU had the longer survival (p = 0.06 for the RP, p = 0.07 for the VSG). In the VSG, median survival was 10 months for the cisplatin group, 13 months for the PCNU group. The difference between treatment groups was significant (p < or = 0.02) when adjusted for important prognostic factors. PCNU lead to greater hematotoxicity; cisplatin lead to greater renal toxicity and some ototoxicity. Some cisplatin patients experienced complications associated with IA administration, including six cases of encephalopathy.
CONCLUSION: The trial showed a survival advantage to the group randomized to PCNU, although the difference was modest. Coupled with previous BTCG results, these trails suggest that PCNU is an active drug for brain tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8543970     DOI: 10.1007/bf01057758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  24 in total

1.  Interrelationships of some chemical, physicochemical, and biological activities of several 1-(2-haloethyl)-1-nitrosoureas.

Authors:  G P Wheeler; B J Bowdon; J A Grimsley; H H Lloyd
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  The antitumor agent cis-Pt(NH 3 ) 2 Cl 2 : distribution studies and dose calculations for 193m Pt and 195m Pt.

Authors:  R C Lange; R P Spencer; H C Harder
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Phase I study of 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(2,6-dioxo-3-piperidyl)-1-nitrosourea (NSC 95466) in adults with solid tumors.

Authors:  D J Stewart; R S Benjamin; M Leavens; M Valdivieso; M A Burgess; G P Bodey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  A randomized comparison of intra-arterial versus intravenous BCNU, with or without intravenous 5-fluorouracil, for newly diagnosed patients with malignant glioma.

Authors:  W R Shapiro; S B Green; P C Burger; R G Selker; J C VanGilder; J T Robertson; J Mealey; J Ransohff; M S Mahaley
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Results of a randomized trial comparing BCNU plus radiotherapy, streptozotocin plus radiotherapy, BCNU plus hyperfractionated radiotherapy, and BCNU following misonidazole plus radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of malignant glioma.

Authors:  M Deutsch; S B Green; T A Strike; P C Burger; J T Robertson; R G Selker; W R Shapiro; J Mealey; J Ransohoff; P Paoletti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A cooperative clinical trial.

Authors:  M D Walker; E Alexander; W E Hunt; C S MacCarty; M S Mahaley; J Mealey; H A Norrell; G Owens; J Ransohoff; C B Wilson; E A Gehan; T A Strike
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  PCNU and recurrent childhood brain tumors.

Authors:  J C Allen; C Hancock; R Walker; C Tan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Superiority of PCNU over AZQ in the treatment of primary brain tumors: results of a prospective randomized trial (81-20) by the Brain Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  M G Malkin; S B Green; D P Byar; T A Strike; P C Burger; F S Vogel; D A Pistenmaa; M S Mahaley; J Ransohoff; W R Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery.

Authors:  M D Walker; S B Green; D P Byar; E Alexander; U Batzdorf; W H Brooks; W E Hunt; C S MacCarty; M S Mahaley; J Mealey; G Owens; J Ransohoff; J T Robertson; W R Shapiro; K R Smith; C B Wilson; T A Strike
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Comparisons of carmustine, procarbazine, and high-dose methylprednisolone as additions to surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of malignant glioma.

Authors:  S B Green; D P Byar; M D Walker; D A Pistenmaa; E Alexander; U Batzdorf; W H Brooks; W E Hunt; J Mealey; G L Odom; P Paoletti; J Ransohoff; J T Robertson; R G Selker; W R Shapiro; K R Smith; C B Wilson; T A Strike
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Intra-arterial cisplatin plus oral etoposide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: a phase II study.

Authors:  L S Ashby; W R Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Convection-enhancement delivery of platinum-based drugs and Lipoplatin(TM) to optimize the concomitant effect with radiotherapy in F98 glioma rat model.

Authors:  Minghan Shi; David Fortin; Léon Sanche; Benoit Paquette
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Toxicities related to intraarterial infusion of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  A Tfayli; P Hentschel; S Madajewicz; J Manzione; N Chowhan; R Davis; P Roche; A Iliya; C Roque; A Meek; M Shady
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Pharmacotherapy of malignant astrocytomas of children and adults: current strategies and future trends.

Authors:  M T Jennings; S Iyengar
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Role of inflammation and oxidative stress in chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Pooja Gupta; Tavneet Kaur Makkar; Lavisha Goel; Monika Pahuja
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.505

Review 6.  Novel therapeutic delivery approaches in development for pediatric gliomas.

Authors:  Katherine E Warren
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  Risk of second primary cancers in cancer patients treated with cisplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.

Authors:  Fei Liang; Sheng Zhang; Hongxi Xue; Qiang Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  The role of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the management of progressive glioblastoma : a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Olson; Lakshmi Nayak; D Ryan Ormond; Patrick Y Wen; Steven N Kalkanis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 4.130

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.