S Choi1, T W Hahn, G Osterhout, T P O'Brien. 1. Ocular Microbiology Laboratory, Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the most effective intravitreal antibiotic treatment of vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis. DESIGN: Animal experiment. SETTING: Seventy-eight New Zealand white rabbits received an intravitreal injection of 10(5) vancomycin-sensitive or -resistant E faecalis organisms in one eye. Infections were allowed to proceed 3 hours before dividing animals randomly into the following treatment groups (n = 6, each): the vancomycin-sensitive E faecalis model--(1) vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL), (2) combined vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and amikacin (0.4 mg/0.1 mL), (3) combined vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and gentamicin (0.1 mg/0.1 mL), (4) combined vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and ceftazidime (2 mg/0.1 mL), (5) combined ampicillin (5 mg/0.1 mL) and gentamicin (0.1 mg/0.1 mL), and (6) pristinamycin (1 mg/0.1 mL); and the vancomycin-resistant E faecalis model--(1)same as above, excluding group 4. Control groups received sterile balanced salt solution. Twenty-four hours following intravitreal treatment, vitreous humor was collected for quantitative bacteriological studies. RESULTS: Intravitreal therapy with combined vancomycin and amikacin provided the most effective reduction of vancomycin-sensitive E faecalis organisms compared with combined vancomycin and gentamicin therapy (P =.10, Wilcoxon's rank sum test) or any other treatment group (P < .01, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). For vancomycin-resistant E faecalis endophthalmitis model, the combined ampicillin and gentamicin therapy was the most effective, followed by the combined vancomycin and amikacin therapy (P < .01, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with intravitreal vancomycin plus amikacin and with intravitreal ampicillin plus gentamicin provide an effective bactericidal therapy for severe experimental vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant E faecalis endophthalmitis, respectively.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the most effective intravitreal antibiotic treatment of vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis. DESIGN: Animal experiment. SETTING: Seventy-eight New Zealand white rabbits received an intravitreal injection of 10(5) vancomycin-sensitive or -resistant E faecalis organisms in one eye. Infections were allowed to proceed 3 hours before dividing animals randomly into the following treatment groups (n = 6, each): the vancomycin-sensitive E faecalis model--(1) vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL), (2) combined vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and amikacin (0.4 mg/0.1 mL), (3) combined vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and gentamicin (0.1 mg/0.1 mL), (4) combined vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and ceftazidime (2 mg/0.1 mL), (5) combined ampicillin (5 mg/0.1 mL) and gentamicin (0.1 mg/0.1 mL), and (6) pristinamycin (1 mg/0.1 mL); and the vancomycin-resistant E faecalis model--(1)same as above, excluding group 4. Control groups received sterile balanced salt solution. Twenty-four hours following intravitreal treatment, vitreous humor was collected for quantitative bacteriological studies. RESULTS: Intravitreal therapy with combined vancomycin and amikacin provided the most effective reduction of vancomycin-sensitive E faecalis organisms compared with combined vancomycin and gentamicin therapy (P =.10, Wilcoxon's rank sum test) or any other treatment group (P < .01, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). For vancomycin-resistant E faecalis endophthalmitis model, the combined ampicillin and gentamicin therapy was the most effective, followed by the combined vancomycin and amikacin therapy (P < .01, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with intravitreal vancomycin plus amikacin and with intravitreal ampicillin plus gentamicin provide an effective bactericidal therapy for severe experimental vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant E faecalis endophthalmitis, respectively.
Authors: H W Kim; S Y Kim; I Y Chung; Joo Eun Lee; Ji Eun Lee; Jung Min Park; Jong Moon Park; Y S Han; B S Oum; I S Byon; I H Yun; H S Yoon; D Park; W J Jeong; B C Yu; I Park; T Bae; K Y Nam; S J Lee Journal: Infection Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Ajay E Kuriyan; Jayanth Sridhar; Harry W Flynn; William E Smiddy; Thomas A Albini; Audina M Berrocal; Richard K Forster; Peter J Belin; Darlene Miller Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Julio C Hernandez-Camarena; Victor M Bautista-de Lucio; Alejandro Navas; Arturo Ramirez-Miranda; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez Journal: Case Rep Ophthalmol Date: 2012-10-24
Authors: Jiyeun Kate Kim; Ki Yup Nam; In Young Chung; Woo Jin Jeung; Yoon Hyung Kwon; Jung Min Park; Yong Seop Han; Ji Eun Lee; Ik Soo Byon; Sung Hu Park; Hyun Wong Kim; Kang Yun Park; Hee Sung Yoon; Indal Park; Han Woo Kim; Sang Joon Lee Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 7.163