Literature DB >> 23185179

Delayed-Onset Post-Keratoplasty Endophthalmitis Caused by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Julio C Hernandez-Camarena1, Victor M Bautista-de Lucio, Alejandro Navas, Arturo Ramirez-Miranda, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) is very rare, the management is a challenge due to both the pattern of antibiotic resistance and the aggressive nature of the infectious process. We report the first delayed-onset case of VRE endophthalmitis after PKP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case report of a 51-year-old female with a 7-week history of PKP who arrived at the emergency room with signs and symptoms of endophthalmitis. Initial visual acuity was light perception, and a posterior pole exam was not possible due to the intense vitreous reaction. Mode B ultrasound was used to assess the posterior pole. The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy and received intravitreous antibiotics.
RESULTS: Vitreous stains and cultures were positive for Enterococcus faecium resistant to vancomycin. Donor rim cultures and viral PCR were negative. Treatment was carried out by repeated intravitreal antibiotics and systemic linezolid. Clinical improvement was seen after the second dose of intravitreous antibiotics and systemic linezolid, but visual acuity remained at light perception consistent with the ischemic changes observed in the posterior pole.
CONCLUSION: VRE endophthalmitis might be associated with positive donor rim cultures. Prompt use of systemic linezolid in addition to intravitreous antibiotics is recommendable, but even with prompt treatment, visual prognosis is guarded.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delayed-onset endophthalmitis; Intravitreal antibiotics; Penetrating keratoplasty; Systemic linezolid; Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus

Year:  2012        PMID: 23185179      PMCID: PMC3506059          DOI: 10.1159/000344006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1663-2699


Introduction

Enterococcus is known to be a relatively uncommon cause of endophthalmitis. According to the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study [1], it constitutes only 1.2% of the reported endophthalmitis cases. This Gram-positive bacterium is part of the biota of the gastrointestinal tract [2] and is recognized for its resistance to cephalosporins, penicillinase-resistant penicillins and monobactams [3]. Postoperative vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus endophthalmitis has been reported after cataract surgery, penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), trabeculectomy and pupilloplasty [4, 5]. However, only 1 case of acute endophthalmitis after PKP caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) has been described to date [6]. We report the first case of delayed-onset VRE endophthalmitis after PKP.

Case Report

We report on a 51-year-old female with a 7-week history of PKP in her left eye after treatment of keratoconus. She presented at the emergency room with severe pain, decreased vision and eyelid edema that started 8 h prior to admission. On clinical examination, she had visual acuity of light perception, severe conjuctival chemosis, ciliary injection, marked corneal stromal edema, anterior chamber reaction and hypopyon (fig. ). Fundus exam was not possible. Mode B ultrasound demonstrated severe dense vitreous opacities and a choroidal thickness of 1.5 mm. A pars plana vitrectomy was performed 24 h after her admittance, and intravitreal ceftazidime (2.25 mg/0.1 ml), vancomycin (1.0 mg/0.1 ml) and dexamethasone (400 µg/0.1 ml) were injected at the end of the procedure. She was treated with topical moxifloxacin 1% and ceftriaxone (50 mg/ml) every hour, oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg twice daily and topical 1% prednisolone acetate every 6 h. Informed consent was obtained from the patient prior the elaboration of this case report.

Results

Both Gram stain and the aqueous sample PCR confirmed the presence of Gram-positive bacteria. Cultures and viral PCR from the donor rim were negative. Vitreous culture showed VRE [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >32 µg/dl]. The organism was susceptible to linezolid (MIC 2 µg/dl) and tetracycline (MIC ≤1 µg/dl). Intravitreal antibiotics and dexamethasone were repeated 72 h after her admission. Intravenous linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 1 week was initiated at the same time. During the next 2 weeks, the pain, chemosis, eyelid and corneal edema improved (fig. ). However, her visual acuity remained at light perception. The fundus exam revealed ischemic retina, a pale optic nerve with some remaining vitreous opacities and pseudomembranes. Anti-inflammatory topical treatment with prednisolone acetate 1% four times daily was continued.

Discussion

Enterococcus endophthalmitis after PKP is very rare. In a series of 29 patients with endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis, Scott et al. [6] reported only 4 cases of endophthalmitis associated with PKP. They described susceptibility to vancomycin and linezolid in all their patients, but even with a prompt management 48.3% of the 29 cases ended up with a visual acuity of light perception or worse. Cameron et al. [7] described 1 case of Enterococcus endophthalmitis after a revision of 3,000 consecutive PKPs. Later, the same author reported 3 cases of E. faecalis endophthalmitis following PKP; all of them had positive cultures from donor rims for the same microorganism, and antibiogram profiles showed sensitivity to minocycline, bacitracin and gentamicin, and moderate sensitivity to vancomycin [8]. In 2007, Bains et al. [9] reported the first known case of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium acute endophthalmitis after PKP with positive cultures of the donor rim. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a delayed-onset VRE endophthalmitis after PKP; hence the second reported case of VRE endophthalmitis after PKP. VRE has come to light as a serious health threat, accounting for 28% of the enterococcal infections in intensive care units in the US [9]. Regardless of the increasing incidence of colonization and infection of patients with this microorganism, ophthalmologic infections caused by VRE are still rare. We have to emphasize that in both cases, VRE was resistant not only to vancomycin but to all the routine antibiotics tested in standard in vitro susceptibility tests. The emergence of multi-resistant pathogens suggests the need for new trends in laboratory microbiological research and antibiotic sensitivities. The clinical response of our case using repeated intravitreal ceftazidime and vancomycin supports the principle that repeated intravitreal antibiotic injection might as well achieve higher than the MICs, therefore reaching a therapeutic response despite of the antibiotic resistance showed in vitro [10, 11]. However, in cases of VRE endophthalmitis the prompt use of systemic linezolid (oral or intravenous) in addition to intravitreal antibiotics is recommendable, since it has shown to achieve aqueous humor and intravitreal concentrations higher than the MIC for 90% of isolates for all Gram-positive bacteria including VRE [12, 13]. Recommendations on the mandatory culture of the sclerocorneal rim after suspected or diagnosed VRE endophthalmitis should be considered, since colonized donor corneal tissue is a potential source of infection, and not every center in developing countries performs it as a routine. Enterococcal endophthalmitis of any type is quite rare, and it is associated with a poor visual prognosis.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no financial interest relevant to the materials presented in this case report.
  11 in total

1.  Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study.

Authors:  D P Han; S R Wisniewski; L A Wilson; M Barza; A K Vine; B H Doft; S F Kelsey
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Postoperative vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Harshivinderjit S Bains; David V Weinberg; Robert S Feder; Gary A Noskin
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09

3.  In vitro veritas? Antimicrobial susceptibility tests and their clinical relevance.

Authors:  D Greenwood
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Endophthalmitis cluster from contaminated donor corneas following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  J A Cameron; I A Badr; J Miguel Risco; E Abboud
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 5.  Vancomycin-resistant staphylococci and enterococci: epidemiology and control.

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; L Clifford McDonald
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.915

6.  Postcataract endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Kuan-Jen Chen; Chi-Chun Lai; Ming-Hui Sun; Tun-Lu Chen; Ko-Jen Yang; Ya-Hui Kuo; An-Ning Chao; Wei-Chi Wu
Journal:  Ocul Immunol Inflamm       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.070

7.  Concentration and bioavailability of ciprofloxacin and teicoplanin in the cornea.

Authors:  Stephen B Kaye; Timothy Neal; Steven Nicholson; Jagoda Szkurlat; Sharon Bamber; Andrew C Baddon; Sarah Anderson; Keeley Seddon; Nichola Dwyer; Andrew M Lovering; Godfrey Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Endophthalmitis caused by enterococcus faecalis: antibiotic selection and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Roy H Loo; Harry W Flynn; Darlene Miller
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Aqueous and vitreous penetration of linezolid (Zyvox) after oral administration.

Authors:  Richard G Fiscella; Wico W Lai; Bruce Buerk; Mona Khan; Keith A Rodvold; Jose S Pulido; Sami Labib; Michael J Shapiro; Norman P Blair
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Endophthalmitis from contaminated donor corneas following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  J A Cameron; S R Antonios; J B Cotter; N R Habash
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Therapeutic Effects of Intravitreously Administered Bacteriophage in a Mouse Model of Endophthalmitis Caused by Vancomycin-Sensitive or -Resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Tatsuma Kishimoto; Waka Ishida; Ken Fukuda; Isana Nakajima; Takashi Suzuki; Jumpei Uchiyama; Shigenobu Matsuzaki; Daisuke Todokoro; Masanori Daibata; Atsuki Fukushima
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Ocular penetration of topically applied 1% tigecycline in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Yasar Sakarya; Rabia Sakarya; Muammer Ozcimen; Sertan Goktas; Serap Ozcimen; Ismail Alpfidan; Ismail Senol Ivacık; Erkan Erdogan; Servet Cetinkaya; Abdulkadir Bukus
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis: clinical features, antibiotic sensitivities, and outcomes.

Authors:  Ajay E Kuriyan; Jayanth Sridhar; Harry W Flynn; William E Smiddy; Thomas A Albini; Audina M Berrocal; Richard K Forster; Peter J Belin; Darlene Miller
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Endophthalmitis caused by Gram-positive organisms with reduced vancomycin susceptibility: literature review and options for treatment.

Authors:  Nidhi Relhan; Thomas A Albini; Avinash Pathengay; Ajay E Kuriyan; Darlene Miller; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  Treatment-Resistant Bacterial Keratitis: Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Sait Egrilmez; Şeyda Yildirim-Theveny
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.