Literature DB >> 8537920

Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics.

R R Seghi1, I L Denry, S F Rosenstiel.   

Abstract

Dental ceramics can fail through growth of microscopic surface flaws that form during processing or from surface impact during service. New restorative dental ceramic materials have been developed to improve resistance to crack propagation. Eleven of these improved materials with the common feature of a considerable amount of crystalline phase in the glassy matrix were evaluated. The ceramic materials studied included fluormica-, leucite-, alumina-, and zirconia-reinforced glasses. The relative hardness and fracture toughness were determined by indentation technique. Alumina-reinforced materials resulted in the highest fracture toughness values, whereas the fluormica- and leucite-reinfoced materials showed more moderate but statistically significant greater values compared with those of control materials. The hardness values of ceramic materials with improved fracture toughness were both substantially higher or lower than those of the control groups and suggested a lack of direct correlation between these two properties. Selection of appropriate restorative materials depends on clinical application and requires consideration of several physical properties including fracture toughness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8537920     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80177-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  18 in total

1.  Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity--a scanning electron microscopic study.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; C Sipos; K-A Hiller; B Thonemann; G Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Contact damage in model dental multilayers: an investigation of the influence of indenter size.

Authors:  P Shrotriya; R Wang; N Katsube; R Seghi; W O Soboyejo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Contact damage in an yttria stabilized zirconia: implications.

Authors:  J Zhou; J Mah; P Shrotriya; C Mercer; W O Soboyejo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Biocompatibility of an x-shaped zirconium implant in deep sclerectomy in rabbits.

Authors:  Alessia Basso; Sylvain Roy; André Mermoud
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications.

Authors:  N D Ruse; M J Sadoun
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Laser all-ceramic crown removal and pulpal temperature--a laboratory proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  P Rechmann; N C H Buu; B M T Rechmann; F C Finzen
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  Ocular prosthesis incorporating IPS e-max press scleral veneer and a literature review on non-integrated ocular prosthesis.

Authors:  Godwin Clovis Da Costa; Meena Ajay Aras; Paul Chalakkal; Michelle Clovis Da Costa
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Influence of cyclic loading on the fracture toughness and load bearing capacities of all-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  Rao-Rao Wang; Cheng-Lin Lu; Gang Wang; Dong-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 6.344

9.  Evaluating the fracture toughness and flexural strength of pressable dental ceramics: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ravi Gurram; C H Vamsi Krishna; K Mahendranadh Reddy; G V K Mohan Reddy; Y Mahadev Shastry
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-10-19

10.  Characterization of glass-infiltrated alumina-based ceramics.

Authors:  Alvaro Della Bona; John J Mecholsky; Allyson A Barrett; Jason A Griggs
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.