Literature DB >> 8537494

Prospective audit of mucosal biopsy specimens of the gastrointestinal tract.

P M Stephenson1, P J Gallagher.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine why mucosal biopsy specimens of the gastrointestinal tract were taken and whether they were justified on clinical or pathological grounds.
METHODS: A prospective audit of 190 consecutive biopsy specimens received in a university hospital histology department over six weeks.
RESULTS: The 31 separate presenting symptoms included diarrhoea (34%), abdominal pain (16%) and rectal bleeding (15%). In 41% (78/190) the histology was normal, 28% (53/190) showed inflammatory changes and 11% 21/190) carcinoma. A clear justification for the procedure was identified in over 90% (171/190) of patients. In 36% (68/190) there was a change in patient management on receipt of biopsy reports and further investigations were ordered in 29% (55/190). The mean time taken to report biopsy specimens was 4.7 working days and there was no difference between the reporting time of a pathologist compared with a consultant or a trainee.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that mucosal biopsy specimens are taken unnecessarily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8537494      PMCID: PMC502951          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.48.10.936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  17 in total

1.  Skin biopsy in general practice.

Authors:  R B Williams; A H Burdge; S L Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09

2.  Performance of skin biopsies by general practitioners.

Authors:  L J McWilliam; F Knox; N Wilkinson; P Oogarah
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09

3.  Endoscopic demands in the 90's.

Authors:  B Scott
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Usefulness of rectal biopsy in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  M J Goodman; J B Kirsner; R H Riddell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  The use and misuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  K L Kahn; J Kosecoff; M R Chassin; D H Solomon; R H Brook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Endoscopy in dyspeptic patients: is gastric mucosal biopsy useful?

Authors:  D Vaira; J Holton; J Osborn; L D'Anna; A Romanos; M Falzon; I McNeil
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Rectal biopsy in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease: value of multiple biopsies and serial sectioning.

Authors:  C M Surawicz; J L Meisel; T Ylvisaker; D R Saunders; C E Rubin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Gastric dysplasia. A histological follow-up study.

Authors:  E P Saraga; D Gardiol; J Costa
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  An evaluation of the significance of microscopic colitis in patients with chronic diarrhea.

Authors:  G W Bo-Linn; D D Vendrell; E Lee; J S Fordtran
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Assessment of dysplasia in colorectal adenomas: an observer variation and morphometric study.

Authors:  L J Brown; N C Smeeton; M F Dixon
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The pathologist in the 21st century--generalist or specialist?

Authors:  N Kirkham
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.