Literature DB >> 8537271

Fluoroquinolones and bacterial enteritis, when and for whom?

J Wiström1, S R Norrby.   

Abstract

During the last decade quinolones such as norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and fleroxacin have emerged as drugs of choice for treatment of various bacterial enteric infections. Controlled studies have shown that quinolones, administered in varying regimens ranging from a single dose to 5 days treatment, significantly reduce the intensity and severity of travellers' diarrhoea as well as shigellosis. They have also been found to be highly effective in the treatment of invasive non-typhoid salmonellosis as well as typhoid fever. Results from trials evaluating quinolone treatment of uncomplicated salmonella and campylobacter enteritis have generally been disappointing. We studied norfloxacin for the empirical treatment of suspected bacterial enteritis of less than 6 days duration in a large placebo controlled trial. Although statistical differences in clinical outcome favouring norfloxacin were found among 259 culture positive patients, the differences were not striking and of doubtful clinical importance. However, a clear beneficial effect of norfloxacin, resembling that observed in early treatment of travellers' diarrhoae was found among the severely ill patients who initiated treatment within 48 h of onset of symptoms to start of treatment seemed to be of major importance in relation to therapeutic efficacy. Quinolone treatment of bacterial enteritis is furthermore limited by the rapid development of resistance seen in Campylobacter spp. and the failure of these compounds to eradicate Salmonella spp. Presently quinolones can be recommended in treatment of travellers' diarrhoea and shigellosis as well as enteric fever. They have limited usefulness for the routine empirical treatment of bacterial enteritis caused by Salmonella spp and Campylobacter spp. Treatment should be restricted to early empirical treatment of the severely ill and vulnerable patients with an underlying health problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8537271     DOI: 10.1093/jac/36.1.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  9 in total

Review 1.  The appropriate use of quinolones.

Authors:  A Percival
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Etiological agents of infectious diarrhea: implications for requests for microbial culture.

Authors:  P Rohner; D Pittet; B Pepey; T Nije-Kinge; R Auckenthaler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Microecologic approaches for traveler's diarrhea, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, and acute pediatric diarrhea.

Authors:  L V McFarland
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-08

4.  Mechanism of therapeutic effectiveness of cefixime against typhoid fever.

Authors:  Y Matsumoto; A Ikemoto; Y Wakai; F Ikeda; S Tawara; K Matsumoto
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Antibiotic manipulation of intestinal microbiota to identify microbes associated with Campylobacter jejuni exclusion in poultry.

Authors:  A J Scupham; J A Jones; E A Rettedal; T E Weber
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Quinolone and macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli: resistance mechanisms and trends in human isolates.

Authors:  J Engberg; F M Aarestrup; D E Taylor; P Gerner-Smidt; I Nachamkin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 7.  Multidrug efflux pumps from Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrio cholerae and Staphylococcus aureus bacterial food pathogens.

Authors:  Jody L Andersen; Gui-Xin He; Prathusha Kakarla; Ranjana K C; Sanath Kumar; Wazir Singh Lakra; Mun Mun Mukherjee; Indrika Ranaweera; Ugina Shrestha; Thuy Tran; Manuel F Varela
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland.

Authors:  Ursula Ledergerber; Gertraud Regula; Roger Stephan; Jürg Danuser; Béatrice Bissig; Katharina D C Stärk
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms among Campylobacter.

Authors:  Kinga Wieczorek; Jacek Osek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.