Literature DB >> 8536597

Variation in performance of the EMG examination at six European laboratories.

A Fuglsang-Frederiksen1, B Johnsen, S Vingtoft, M Carvalho, P Fawcett, R Liguori, W Nix, I Schofield, M Veloso, A Vila.   

Abstract

The quality of the EMG examination might be improved by standardization. However, knowledge about interlaboratory differences in the performance of the EMG examination is a prerequisite for standardization. The aim of this study was to describe differences in EMG techniques used and number of muscles and nerves examined per patient at 6 European EMG laboratories. The EMG results of 595 patients were prospectively sampled. The average number of muscles examined per patient in different disorders varied from laboratory to laboratory, for example from 3.0 to 10.8 muscles in anterior horn cell disorders and from 2.0 to 5.5 muscles in myopathies. The average number of muscles examined by quantitative EMG varied from 0 to 4.3 in anterior horn cell disorders and from 0.0 to 4.5 in myopathies. Also the average number of nerve segments examined per patient varied from laboratory for example from 2.7 to 17.7 for motor segments and from 3.1 to 9.0 for sensory segments in polyneuropathies. The laboratories that used needle electrodes for nerve conduction studies and quantitative analysis of individual motor unit potentials examined a smaller number of muscles and nerves than laboratories using surface electrodes for nerve conduction studies and qualitative EMG studies. The results of this study may have impact on guidelines and examination protocols as well as on quality assurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8536597     DOI: 10.1016/0924-980x(95)00149-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  7 in total

1.  Requests for electromyography from general practitioners and specialists: critical evaluation.

Authors:  M Mondelli; M Giacchi; A Federico
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-08

2.  Requests for electromyography in Rome: a critical evaluation.

Authors:  Roberto Di Fabio; Claudio Castagnoli; Andrea Madrigale; Massimo Barella; Mariano Serrao; Francesco Pierelli
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

3.  Quantitative T2 -mapping magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of muscle motor unit recruitment patterns.

Authors:  Erin C Argentieri; Ek Tsoon Tan; Jeremy S Whang; Sophie C Queler; Joseph H Feinberg; Bin Lin; Darryl B Sneag
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Requests of electrodiagnostic testing: consistency and agreement of referral diagnosis. What is changed in a primary outpatient EMG lab 16 years later?

Authors:  Mauro Mondelli; Alessandro Aretini; Giuseppe Greco
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Standardization of surface electromyography utilized to evaluate patients with dysphagia.

Authors:  Michael Vaiman
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 6.  Surface electromyography as a screening method for evaluation of dysphagia and odynophagia.

Authors:  Michael Vaiman; Ephraim Eviatar
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 7.  Evidence-based recommendations for examination and diagnostic strategies of polyneuropathy electrodiagnosis.

Authors:  H Tankisi; K Pugdahl; S Beniczky; H Andersen; A Fuglsang-Frederiksen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2019-11-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.