Literature DB >> 24598396

Requests for electromyography in Rome: a critical evaluation.

Roberto Di Fabio, Claudio Castagnoli, Andrea Madrigale, Massimo Barella, Mariano Serrao, Francesco Pierelli.   

Abstract

To date, there exist no data reporting the level of suitability of requests for electromyography examinations (EMGs) in Rome. The records of 1,220 consecutive patients (age: 57.6±15.0 years; 400 M, 820 F) in two neurophysiology laboratories were collected and analyzed. In total, 1,317 EMGs were requested, mainly by general practitioners (GPs) (57%) and orthopedic specialists (18%). The most common diagnoses were L4-L5 radiculopathy (22%) and carpal tunnel syndrome (21%); 332 examinations (25%) were normal. 68% of requests were not accompanied by any specific query. The concordance between initial hypothesis/final post-EMG diagnosis was low (<20%). When a specific query was indicated, the initial suspicion was confirmed by EMG in 54% of GP requests and 64% of requests by specialists (p=0.03). No difference in diagnostic ability was found between specialists (p>0.05). In 17% of cases, the EMG was deemed diagnostically useless by the neurophysiologist, which seems to indicate potentially suboptimal prescription of EMGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24598396      PMCID: PMC3951256          DOI: 10.11138/FNeur/2013.28.4.281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Neurol        ISSN: 0393-5264


  7 in total

1.  Requests for electromyography from general practitioners and specialists: critical evaluation.

Authors:  M Mondelli; M Giacchi; A Federico
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-08

Review 2.  Clinical nerve conduction and needle electromyography studies.

Authors:  Donald H Lee; Gwendolyn C Claussen; Shin Oh
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Differences in the handling of the EMG examination at seven European laboratories.

Authors:  B Johnsen; A Fuglsang-Frederiksen; S Vingtoft; P Fawcett; R Liguori; W Nix; G Otte; J Proença; I Schofield; G Sieben
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-04

4.  Referral diagnosis versus electroneurophysiological finding. Two years electroneuromyographic consultation in a rehabilitation clinic.

Authors:  R Danner
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Apr-May

5.  A further critical evaluation of requests for electrodiagnostic examinations.

Authors:  D Cocito; A Tavella; P Ciaramitaro; P Costa; F Poglio; I Paolasso; E Duranda; F M Cossa; B Bergamasco
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Critical reappraisal of referrals to electromyography and nerve conduction studies.

Authors:  S Podnar
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.089

7.  Variation in performance of the EMG examination at six European laboratories.

Authors:  A Fuglsang-Frederiksen; B Johnsen; S Vingtoft; M Carvalho; P Fawcett; R Liguori; W Nix; I Schofield; M Veloso; A Vila
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-12
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Association of Psychometric Indices and Normal Electrodiagnostic Studies in Referral for Suspected Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Marianna Papadopoulou; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Ioanna Chatzi; Lina Palaiodimou; Marianna Bregianni; Konstantinos Voumvourakis; Ioannis Michopoulos
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Knowledge of electromyography (EMG) in patients undergoing EMG examinations.

Authors:  Mauro Mondelli; Alessandro Aretini; Giuseppe Greco
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

3.  EMG indications and findings in a sub-Saharan African neurorehabilitation center.

Authors:  Philip B Adebayo; Funmilola T Taiwo; Mayowa O Owolabi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2018-04-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.