Literature DB >> 8535489

Ventilation rate in office buildings and sick building syndrome.

J J Jaakkola1, P Miettinen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between ventilation rate and occurrence of symptoms of the eyes, nose, throat, and skin as well as general symptoms such as lethargy and headache, often termed the sick building syndrome.
METHODS: A cross sectional population based study was carried out in 399 workers from 14 mechanically ventilated office buildings without air recirculation or humidification, selected randomly from the Helsinki metropolitan area. The ventilation type and other characteristics of these buildings were recorded on a site visit and the ventilation in the rooms was assessed by measuring the airflow through the exhaust air outlets in the room. A questionnaire directed at workers inquired about the symptoms and perceived air quality and their possible personal and environmental determinants (response rate 81%). The outcomes were weekly work related symptoms experienced during the previous 12 months and symptom groups defined either by their anatomical location or hypothesised mechanism.
RESULTS: In logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for any symptom of interest was 3.03 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13 to 8.10) in the very low ventilation category of below 5 l/s per person and 2.24 (0.89 to 5.65) in the high ventilation category of over 25 l/s per person compared with the reference (15- < 25 l/s). The ORs for ocular (1.27, 1.11 to 1.46), nasal (1.17, 1.06 to 1.29), skin symptoms (1.18, 1.05 to 1.32), and lethargy (1.09, 1.00 to 1.19) increased significantly by a unit decrease in ventilation from 25 to 0 l/s per person.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that outdoor air ventilation rates below the optimal (15 to 25 l/s per person) increase the risk of the symptoms of sick building syndrome with the sources of pollutants present in mechanically ventilated office buildings. The Finnish guideline value is 10 l/s per person.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8535489      PMCID: PMC1128350          DOI: 10.1136/oem.52.11.709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  7 in total

1.  Influence of indoor climate on the sick building syndrome in an office environment. The Danish Indoor Climate Study Group.

Authors:  P Skov; O Valbjørn; B V Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Consistent pattern of elevated symptoms in air-conditioned office buildings: a reanalysis of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  M J Mendell; A H Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Sick building syndrome: a study of 4373 office workers.

Authors:  S Burge; A Hedge; S Wilson; J H Bass; A Robertson
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1987

4.  Type of ventilation system in office buildings and sick building syndrome.

Authors:  J J Jaakkola; P Miettinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies.

Authors:  M J Finnegan; C A Pickering; P S Burge
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-08

6.  Air recirculation and sick building syndrome: a blinded crossover trial.

Authors:  J J Jaakkola; P Tuomaala; O Seppänen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The effect of varying levels of outdoor-air supply on the symptoms of sick building syndrome.

Authors:  R Menzies; R Tamblyn; J P Farant; J Hanley; F Nunes; R Tamblyn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Building sickness syndrome in healthy and unhealthy buildings: an epidemiological and environmental assessment with cluster analysis.

Authors:  R M Niven; A M Fletcher; C A Pickering; E B Faragher; I N Potter; W B Booth; T J Jones; P D Potter
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Sick building syndrome.

Authors:  P S Burge
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Is health in office buildings related only to psychosocial factors?

Authors:  M J Mendell; W J Fisk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Indoor air quality in university environments.

Authors:  Mara Di Giulio; Rossella Grande; Emanuela Di Campli; Soraya Di Bartolomeo; Luigina Cellini
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  The relationship between upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms attributed to work and risk factors in office workers.

Authors:  Prawit Janwantanakul; Praneet Pensri; Wiroj Jiamjarasrangsi; Thanes Sinsongsook
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Dustborne fungi in large office buildings.

Authors:  Hsing Jasmine Chao; Donald K Milton; Joel Schwartz; Harriet A Burge
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.574

7.  Indoor air quality in Brazilian universities.

Authors:  Sonia R Jurado; Antônia D P Bankoff; Andrea Sanchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Reinventing Cloth Masks in the Face of Pandemics.

Authors:  Stephen Salter
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.302

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.