Literature DB >> 8533334

Human efficiency for recognizing and detecting low-pass filtered objects.

W L Braje1, B S Tjan, G E Legge.   

Abstract

Recently, Tjan, Braje, Legge and Kersten [(1995) Vision Research, 35, 3053-3069] found that human efficiency for object recognition was less than 10%, indicating that humans fail to use much of the information available to an ideal observer. We examine two explanations for these low efficiencies: (1) humans are inefficient in using high spatial-frequency information; and (2) humans are inefficient in detecting image samples. We tested the first possibility by measuring human efficiency for recognizing low-pass filtered objects, rendered as line drawings and silhouettes, in luminance noise. Efficiency did not improve when high frequencies were removed, and the first explanation was rejected. We tested the second explanation by comparing efficiencies for object detection and recognition. Recognition efficiency was higher than detection efficiency for silhouettes but not line drawings, showing that detection efficiency does not place a ceiling on recognition efficiency. The results indicate that human vision is designed to extract image features, such as contours, that enhance recognition. A computer simulation suggests that this can occur if the observer views the world through a band-pass spatial-frequency channel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8533334     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00071-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Object imagery and object identification: object imagers are better at identifying spatially-filtered visual objects.

Authors:  Manila Vannucci; Giuliana Mazzoni; Carlo Chiorri; Lavinia Cioli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-01-24

2.  Pattern recognition in correlated and uncorrelated noise.

Authors:  Brianna Conrey; Jason M Gold
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Search in 1/f 2.8 Filtered Noise and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Phantoms.

Authors:  Aditya Jonnalagadda; Miguel A Lago; Bruno Barufaldi; Predrag R Bakic; Craig K Abbey; Andrew D Maidment; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

4.  Use of Sub-Ensembles and Multi-Template Observers to Evaluate Detection Task Performance for Data That are Not Multivariate Normal.

Authors:  Xin Li; Abhinav K Jha; Michael Ghaly; Fatma E A Elshahaby; Jonathan M Links; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  The surprisingly high human efficiency at learning to recognize faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Information processing correlates of a size-contrast illusion.

Authors:  Jason M Gold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-19

7.  Repetition blindness for natural images of objects with viewpoint changes.

Authors:  Stéphane Buffat; Justin Plantier; Corinne Roumes; Jean Lorenceau
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-22

8.  Spatiotemporal integration of visual stimuli and its relevance to the use of a divisional power supply scheme for retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Yueh-Chun Tsai; José Jiun-Shian Wu; Po-Kang Lin; Bo-Jyun Lin; Pin-Shiou Wang; Ching-Hsiang Liu; Chung-Yu Wu; Chuan-Chin Chiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.