Literature DB >> 8533326

Discrimination of orientation-defined texture edges.

S S Wolfson1, M S Landy.   

Abstract

Preattentive texture segregation was examined using textures composed of randomly placed, oriented line segments. A difference in texture element orientation produced an illusory, or orientation-defined, texture edge. Subjects discriminated between two textures, one with a straight texture edge and one with a "wavy" texture edge. Across conditions the orientation of the texture elements and the orientation of the texture edge varied. Although the orientation difference across the texture edge (the "texture gradient") is an important determinant of texture segregation performance, it is not the only one. Evidence from several experiments suggests that configural effects are also important. That is, orientation-defined texture edges are strongest when the texture elements (on one side of the edge) are parallel to the edge. This result is not consistent with a number of texture segregation models including feature- and filter-based models. One possible explanation is that the second-order channel used to detect a texture edge of a particular orientation gives greater weight to first-order input channels of that same orientation.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8533326     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00302-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Combination of texture and color cues in visual segmentation.

Authors:  Toni P Saarela; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual saliency and texture segregation without feature gradient.

Authors:  Ohad Ben-Shahar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Optical imaging of contextual interactions in V1 of the behaving monkey.

Authors:  Masaharu Kinoshita; Charles D Gilbert; Aniruddha Das
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Marisa Carrasco; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A perceptual space of local image statistics.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Daniel J Thengone; Syed M Rizvi; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Responses to orientation discontinuities in V1 and V2: physiological dissociations and functional implications.

Authors:  Anita M Schmid; Keith P Purpura; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Textures as Probes of Visual Processing.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte; Charles F Chubb
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

8.  Sensitivity and configuration-specificity of orientation-defined texture processing in infants and adults.

Authors:  Francesca Pei; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Development of sensitivity to visual texture modulation in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Yasmine El-Shamayleh; J Anthony Movshon; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Subpopulations of neurons in visual area v2 perform differentiation and integration operations in space and time.

Authors:  Anita M Schmid; Keith P Purpura; Ifije E Ohiorhenuan; Ferenc Mechler; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.