Literature DB >> 8532501

Evaluation of a dynamical model of speech perception.

P Case1, B Tuller, M Ding, J A Kelso.   

Abstract

Previous work (Tuller, Case, Ding, & Kelso, 1994) has revealed signature properties of nonlinear dynamical systems in how people categorize speech sounds. The data were modeled by using a two-well potential function that deformed with stimulus properties and was sensitive to context. Here we evaluate one prediction of the model--namely, that the rate of change of the potential's slope should increase when the category is repeatedly perceived. Judged goodness of category membership was used as an index of the slope of the potential. Stimuli from a "say"-"stay" continuum were presented with gap duration changing sequentially throughout the range from 0 to 76 to 0 msec, or from 76 to 0 to 76 msec. Subjects identified each token as either "say" or "stay" and rated how good an exemplar it was of the identified category. As predicted, the same physical stimulus presented at the end of a sequence was judged a better exemplar of the category than was the identical stimulus presented at the beginning of the sequence. In contrast, stimuli presented twice near the middle of a sequence with few (or no) stimuli between them, as well as stimuli presented with an intervening random set, showed no such differences. These results confirm the hypothesis of a context-sensitive dynamical representation underlying speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8532501     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  23 in total

1.  Modeling phoneme perception. I: Categorical perception.

Authors:  M E Schouten; A J van Hessen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modeling phoneme perception. II: A model of stop consonant discrimination.

Authors:  A J van Hessen; M E Schouten
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

4.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories.

Authors:  L E Volaitis; J L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The impact of fluctuations on the recognition of ambiguous patterns.

Authors:  T Ditzinger; H Haken
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  The production and perception of syllable structure.

Authors:  B Tuller; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-06

7.  The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation.

Authors:  A Parducci; D H Wedell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization.

Authors:  B Tuller; P Case; M Ding; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Lip-larynx coordination in speech: effects of mechanical perturbations to the lower lip.

Authors:  K G Munhall; A Löfqvist; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Phonetic prototypes.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  Categorization of ambiguous sentences as a function of a changing prosodic parameter: a dynamical approach.

Authors:  J Raczaszek; B Tuller; L P Shapiro; P Case; S Kelso
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1999-07

2.  Activating basic category exemplars in sentence contexts: a dynamical account.

Authors:  Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi; Lewis P Shapiro; Betty Tuller; J A Scott Kelso
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-03

3.  Classifying acoustic signals into phoneme categories: average and dyslexic readers make use of complex dynamical patterns and multifractal scaling properties of the speech signal.

Authors:  Fred Hasselman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Perceptual Plasticity for Auditory Object Recognition.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Stephen C Van Hedger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

5.  How previous experience shapes perception in different sensory modalities.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Caspar M Schwiedrzik; A Davi Vitela; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.