Literature DB >> 8532261

Lactation after augmentation mammoplasty.

N M Hurst1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lactation outcomes of breast-augmented women and nonaugmented women.
METHODS: This study used a retrospective, comparative design. Demographic and descriptive data were obtained from client records maintained by a lactation support program at a large children's hospital in the southwest United States. The association between breast augmentation and lactation outcome in the two groups was investigated by obtaining data from these existing records.
RESULTS: A significantly greater incidence of lactation insufficiency was found in augmented women compared with nonaugmented women (P < .001). Among 42 augmented women, 27 (64%) had insufficient lactation, compared with only three (less than 7%) of the 42 nonaugmented women. Augmented women who experienced sufficient lactation were equivalent in age, ethnicity, type of delivery, smoking, previous breast-feeding experience, and lactation course compared to augmented women with lactation insufficiency. However, the type of breast incision was significantly associated with lactation outcome. More specifically, it was the periareolar approach that was most significantly associated with lactation insufficiency (P < .01). The incidence of lactation insufficiency with the submammary-axillary approach was only statistically significant when compared with nonaugmented women.
CONCLUSION: A significantly greater incidence of insufficient lactation was found among augmented women compared with nonaugmented women. The periareolar approach was most significantly associated with lactation insufficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8532261     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00349-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  [Plastic surgical body form correction. Part II: Face-lift, periorbital surgery, and breast augmentation and reduction].

Authors:  H Ryssel; G Germann; C Heitmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Normal Breastfeeding after Breast Reconstruction in a Patient with Poland's Syndrome.

Authors:  Eveline B Madeira; Júlio C Queiroz de França; Benedito de Sousa Almeida Filho; Ana L Nascimento Araújo; Sabas C Vieira
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  The impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michal Schiff; Charles S Algert; Amanda Ampt; Mark S Sywak; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.461

4.  The Transareolar-Periareolar Approach.

Authors:  Jonathan Zelken; Jung-Ju Huang; Chih-Wei Wu; Yi-Ling Lin; Ming-Huei Cheng
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-09-07

5.  Low Risk of Skin and Nipple Sensitivity and Lactation Issues After Primary Breast Augmentation with Form-Stable Silicone Implants: Follow-Up in 4927 Subjects.

Authors:  Herluf G Lund; Janet Turkle; Mark L Jewell; Diane K Murphy
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.