Literature DB >> 8531882

Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis.

D Wei1, H P Chan, M A Helvie, B Sahiner, N Petrick, D D Adler, M M Goodsitt.   

Abstract

We investigated the feasibility of using multiresolution texture analysis for differentiation of masses from normal breast tissue on mammograms. The wavelet transform was used to decompose regions of interest (ROIs) on digitized mammograms into several scales. Multiresolution texture features were calculated from the spatial gray level dependence matrices of (1) the original images at variable distances between the pixel pairs, (2) the wavelet coefficients at different scales, and (3) the wavelet coefficients up to certain scale and then at variable distances between the pixel pairs. In this study, 168 ROIs containing biopsy-proven masses and 504 ROIs containing normal parenchyma were used as the data set. The mass ROIs were randomly and equally divided into training and test groups along with corresponding normal ROIs from the same film. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis was used to select optimal features from the multiresolution texture feature space to maximize the separation of mass and normal tissue for all ROIs. We found that texture features at large pixel distances are important for the classification task. The wavelet transform can effectively condense the image information into its coefficients. With texture features based on the wavelet coefficients and variable distances, the area Az under the receiver operating characteristic curve reached 0.89 and 0.86 for the training and test groups, respectively. The results demonstrate that a linear discriminant classifier using the multiresolution texture features can effectively classify masses from normal tissue on mammograms.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8531882     DOI: 10.1118/1.597418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31

2.  Voice-activated retrieval of mammography reference images.

Authors:  H A Swett; P G Mutalik; V P Neklesa; L Horvath; C Lee; J Richter; I Tocino; P R Fisher
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors.

Authors:  Denise Guliato; Juliano D de Carvalho; Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Sérgio A Santiago
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Kenneth A Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Classification of breast tissue in mammograms using efficient coding.

Authors:  Daniel D Costa; Lúcio F Campos; Allan K Barros
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Heterogeneity of focal breast lesions and surrounding tissue assessed by mammographic texture analysis: preliminary evidence of an association with tumor invasion and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Olga Strukowska; Karoline Skogen; Rupert Young; Chris Chatwin; Ken Miles
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Methods Used in Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammograms: A Review.

Authors:  Saleem Z Ramadan
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.682

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.