Literature DB >> 8531484

Non-linear summation of responses in averages of rectified EMG.

S N Baker1, R N Lemon.   

Abstract

Studies on the motor system commonly use averages of rectified electromyogram (EMG) to measure muscular response. The assumption is usually made that this is a linear measure of response magnitude. It is shown here using a theoretical and experimental model that averages of rectified EMG can lead to non-linearities, which are of particular importance when considering the summation of two independent responses. When responses had a highly stereotyped waveform from trial to trial, so that averages of unrectified EMG revealed a deflection from zero, in measurements from averages of rectified EMG the size of a response to two stimuli delivered together was greater than the linear sum of the responses to each stimulus delivered alone. This deviation from linearity was greatest when two responses which were small relative to the ongoing background EMG activity were combined. The total response was then as much as twice as large as the linear sum of the individual component responses. Conversely, under conditions where responses were highly variable from trial to trial, resulting in no consistent deflection being seen in an average of unrectified EMG, the summed responses in rectified and averaged EMG were smaller than expected if summation were linear. This effect was most pronounced when both component responses were relatively large; the combined response tended asymptotically to approximately 70% of the linear sum of the component responses. A practical method is presented which allows prediction of the size of a response to two stimuli given together, when measured from averages of rectified EMG, on the assumption that they act independently.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8531484     DOI: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)00180-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  10 in total

1.  Is the long-latency stretch reflex in human masseter transcortical?

Authors:  Sophie L Pearce; Timothy S Miles; Philip D Thompson; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation during the long latency component of the cutaneomotor reflex.

Authors:  Meg Stuart; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Properties of rectified averaging of an evoked-type signal: theory and application to the vestibular-evoked myogenic potential.

Authors:  J G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Coherent oscillations in monkey motor cortex and hand muscle EMG show task-dependent modulation.

Authors:  S N Baker; E Olivier; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Dynamic control of location-specific information in tactile cutaneous reflexes from the foot during human walking.

Authors:  B M Van Wezel; F A Ottenhoff; J Duysens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Modulatory effects of the supplementary motor area on primary motor cortex outputs.

Authors:  Sandrine L Côté; Guillaume Elgbeili; Stephan Quessy; Numa Dancause
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spindle and motoneuronal contributions to the phase advance of the human stretch reflex and the reduction of tremor.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in primate corticospinal connections induced during free behavior.

Authors:  Yukio Nishimura; Steve I Perlmutter; Ryan W Eaton; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Different contributions of primary motor cortex, reticular formation, and spinal cord to fractionated muscle activation.

Authors:  Boubker Zaaimi; Lauren R Dean; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Interhemispheric modulations of motor outputs by the rostral and caudal forelimb areas in rats.

Authors:  Boris Touvykine; Guillaume Elgbeili; Stephan Quessy; Numa Dancause
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.